Before we get to the game preview, I wanted to address an irritation. A lot of analysts and commentators have been picking the Hornets as a first round casualty this offseason. None of them can cite a basketball reason why that would be so, and instead they cite "playoff inexperience". It's a pretty common refrain - teams that reach the playoffs have to pay their dues before getting very far in them.
In the case of the Hornets, it's crap. They are not the standard team that just managed to get into the playoffs with a low seed. This team is on pace to win 55 wins, and has established a top 5 scoring differential, which as I've said before, has a strong correlation to playoff success.
Still, in order to refute the charges, I went back and collected every team in the last 15-20 years that earned 50 or more wins one year after having been out of the playoffs. Here they are:
1st Round and Out
- 93-94 Magic(50-32), Swept by Pacers
- 03-04 Grizzlies(50-32), Swept by Spurs
- 06-07 Rockets(50-32), Jazz won in 7
- 93-94 Warriors(50-32), Swept by Suns
2nd Round
- 04-05 Sonics(52-30), Spurs won in 6
- 97-98 Spurs(56-26), Jazz won in 5
- 01-02 Pistons(50-32), Celtics won in 5
- 01-02 Mavericks(53-29), Spurs won in 5
Conference Finals
- 06-07 Jazz(51-31), Spurs won in 5
- 04-05 Suns(62-20),Spurs won in 5
- 97-98 Pacers(58-24), Bulls won in 7
- 88-89 Suns(55-27), Swept by Lakers
- 91-92 Cavaliers(57-25), Bulls won in 6
NBA Finals
- 01-02 Nets(52-30, Under Byron Scott, no less), Swept by Lakers
As you can see, usually the team gets past the first round. And if you look at those records in the first round, you'll also see those teams probably weren't as strong as this Hornets team. Even taking into account the strength of the Western Conference, nothing I see above supports the idea of playoff inexperience being a valid reason the Hornets would get dropped early. So screw you, nay-sayers.
It does look like it would be a historical event should the Hornets win it all. Something to gun for, right?
Game Preview
Matchup: Hornets(47-21) @ Pacers(29-41)
Off Efficiency: Hornets 108.5(6th), Pacers 103.2(18th)
Def Efficiency: Hornets 102.3(5th), Pacers 104.9(16th)
Pacer Blogger: Indy Cornrows
Tonight the Hornets visit one of my old haunts, Indiana, wanting to kick off a 6-game Eastern Conference roadtrip on a good note. The Pacers are on a bit of an upswing, having won four in a row, but that success is mitigated by the beaten teams being the Knicks, Bobcats, Timberwolves and Bulls. Still, this team is fighting to get that last playoff spot out East(if you can call what's occuring out there 'fighting') and won't just lay down and die. This team also beat the Hornets during a hot start earlier this season when they hit their three point shots and we missed an appalling 22 shots from deep. Like I said earlier this week, the Pacers defense is predicated on giving up open threes, so we'll need at least a couple guys hitting from deep to make this team pay for the policy.
The guys need to start this roadtrip with a fire in their belly. They get Cleveland, Boston, Orlando and Toronto next, and need to feast on the little teams in case they slip against the good opponents on the road.
Byron has told Chris Andersen he'll play sometime this road trip too - so one more thing to look forward to.
Injuries: None for the Hornets. Yay. The Pacers are missing the everinjured couple, Jermaine O'Neal and Jamaal Tinsley.
Positional Analysis
PG: Flip Murray v Chris Paul
Advantage: Hornets
When I took a look at Indiana and saw Flip Murray listed as the starting point guard, I did a doubletake, and then chortled as I tried to remember Flip ever passing the ball. I mean, the guy is capable of running an offense - if the offense is Flip dribbling, dribbling, shooting, missing.
Paul is pretty good. He should be able to keep up.
SG: Mike Dunleavy v Morris Peterson
Advantage: Pacers
I have a suspicion that Dunleavy is the default point guard when Flip is on the floor. The much-maligned Dunleavy has a diverse set of skills, a nice stroke and can make offensive contributions. He'd be an excellent scoring sixth man on a good team. Too bad he's the primary option for the Pacers. Peterson is in an extended slump, and though his defense remains good, his offense is making it harder and harder to keep him on the floor for long stretches. Good thing we've got Bonzi and Julian.
SF: Danny Granger v Peja Stojakovic
Advantage: Hornets
Peja has been in a bit of a shooting slump the last few games, mostly missing on wide open shots. That won't keep happening. Granger is a good defender, but Peja only seems to be bothered by physical and elite defenders like Bowen and Battier, and he's not in their class. Granger's primary offense is not post-based either, which is the place where Peja's defense is weakest. As long as Peja is hitting a little, he'll own this spot.
PF: Troy Murphy v David West
Advantage: Hornets
Troy is slow, but makes up for it by hovering far away from the basket and hitting lots of long range shots. He's going to pull West away from the basket a lot, and probably hit a few three's, but there isn't a chance in hell he'll be able to stop West. There isn't a frontcourt player on the Pacers who can. Expect double teams.
C: Jeff Foster v Tyson Chandler
Advantage: Hornets
Offensively Jeff Foster makes Tyson Chandler look like Amare Stoudamire in the post, but he is one of the few big men in the NBA who can match Tyson's rebounding skill. It'll be a hard battle down low, but Tyson does have an advantage in athleticism.
Bench
Advantage: Hornets
The Hornets bench trio of Pargo, Wells and Wright continue to be effective as a group. If Andersen can play, our bench will be great. The Pacers have a good backup at the swing positions in Shawne Williams, but the rest of their bench is weak. Ike Diogu doesn't get any time despite having been pretty promising, and Marquis hasn't done much since coming over from Dallas and getting injured. The Hornets 2nd unit defense should have little trouble holding these guys down.
Hornets win 109-97.


12 super-fantastic comments post your own
entersandman
03/25/08 07:04 AM
The Hornets and Celtics could both be in the Finals a year after missing the playoffs... that's also gotta be some kind of record, right?
atthehive.wordpress.com #1
Ron Hitley
03/25/08 07:35 AM
Loving your research, Ryan. So, 10 of 14 teams who won 50+ after missing the Playoffs the previous season advanced past the first round. That's good to know. Admittedly though, this year's West is just ridiculous, so even if the Hornets do get bumped in round one I don't think it would be a massive disappointment. Hell, all four first round series could go to seven games in the West. It's that tough. Regarding the game tonight, yeah, we really need this one to start the trip off strong. No easy games this close to the finish. Let's hope our guys don't play down to the competition again so we can get a nice lead early, turn it into a blowout, rest the big guns and let the Bird fly.
www.hornets247.com #2
Ryan Schwan
03/25/08 07:44 AM
Yes, indeed, Sandman. According to that list, only one team has ever made it to the Finals after missing the playoffs the year before. Of course, there could have been one before 1988 - which is as far back as I went. I'm kinda eager to see Birdman play. The idea we could have a serviceable backup big man is very enticing to me.
www.hornets247.com #3
entersandman
03/25/08 07:51 AM
Yeah, especially on the defensive end. Wells and Wright are doing an amazing job with opposing forwards and guards, Pargo's been solid with his full court press job on other points... only Ely and Armstrong could use some help in the paint. I just hope Birdman hasn't lost (too) much of his athleticism.
atthehive.wordpress.com #4
Chris Trew
03/25/08 09:16 AM
Birdman! (is it okay for us to still call him that?)
www.christrew.com #5
Raf
03/25/08 09:26 AM
There are still +10games remaining. We shall see whats going to happen. But yeah, Hornets are on their way to even 55+.
www.dribbler.org #6
Mikey
03/25/08 09:36 AM
Ryan, of those teams you listed that were outed in the 1st round, what were the records of the teams they faced? I'm not pointing this out to play devil's advocate, but it seems that those 4 teams you mentioned all went up against perennial playoff powerhouses (wow, 3 P words in a row, wierd). Perhapswe should take a look at that when weforecast potential matchups. As I recall from the game in November, albeit without looking at a boxscore, Troy Murphy killed us in that game. D-Weezy cannot allow him to get his stroke going. Defense, namely rebounding and contesting shots, will get us through this game. Of course shooting better than 39% will definintely help. Thats what we shot back in the November loss.
#7
ticktock6
03/25/08 10:00 AM
I was going to say, that goes for the Celtics too. They weren't in the playoffs last year. But I see someone mentioned that.
hornetshype.com #8
Will
03/25/08 10:16 AM
Good stuff as usual
#9
Steve H
03/25/08 11:48 AM
Hear me now, and believe me later- you guys are gonna be thrilled with the Birdman as a back up big. Picture Ryan Bowen with some hops and a seven foot wingspan. In my three years of seriously following the hornets- this is the first time I can say Iam completely satisfied with our line-up. No gaps to fill- no "If only we could sign that dude" musings. We need to re-sign Bonzi (Bonzilla anyone? anyone?) this off season- but other than that, I don't have a care in the world for this team's future. We have the core of this team locked down for the next three years- and lots of champagne and W's on the horizon. I'm also delighted that NO's attendance woes are a thing of the past. I would have loved to see them come back to OKC for selfish reasons, but my strong second choice was having an excuse to visit Nawlins on a regular basis. Life is good.
#10
mW
03/25/08 11:56 AM
Honestly, I don't see a lot of upsets in this year's playoffs, minus the fact that the Jazz will probably bow out (a top 4 seed via their division crown). While the West is deep, the injuries to Yao and Nowitski trim the crowd. The Lakers, Hornets, Suns, and Spurs seem like the most likely teams to advance, no matter their opponents.
www.hornetshype.com #11
Emir lidan
03/25/08 04:54 PM
btw the team together doesnt have play off experience but i know peja bonzi james have all probly been there and if any of you were sacremento fans 5 years ago u know peja isnt afraid to take a shot when its on the line
#12