I started putting together my Hornets-Spurs preview this morning, but as I did so, I realized we have some time until Saturday's Game 1 against the Spurs and I wanted to take some time to look at the Hornet's success in round one, and evaluate what the Hornets did well - and didn't do so well. Oh, and surprise, I'll be using stats a lot.
A lot has been made of the Laker's domination of the Nuggets and their 114 points per game in the playoffs, but they aren't the most efficient offense so far in the postseason. That honor falls to the New Orleans Hornets, who managed 114.9 points per 100 posessions in the five games against Dallas. That number is a full 6 points better than what the Hornets did in the regular season, and was done against a top 7 defense.
In fact, despite all the pundits insisting the Hornets would fall due to post-season inexperience, which is another way of saying the Hornets were going to buckle under the pressure and get sloppy, every offensive statistic points to a highly disciplined Hornets team.
- The Hornets controlled the tempo, keeping the game to a slow and deliberate pace of 89.4 posessions per game.
- The Hornets limited their 3-point shooting, only firing up 14.8 shots from deep compared to 19.8 in the regular season.
- Having limited their deep shooting to only open shots, the Hornets drilled 46% from deep, 7% better than the regular season, and managed to collect 6.8 three pointers a game, only .9 less than they were getting when they shot 5 more a game.
- The Hornets tied for the lead in the regular season for taking care of the ball. Taking advantage of the fact that Dallas was the worst team in the league at creating turnovers, the Hornets turned the ball over only 8.4% of the time, down from 11.4% in the regular season.
- The remarkable cut in turnovers allowed the Hornets to register a post-season leading 2.81 assists for every turnover.
Where did the improved offensive efficiency come from? Not Paul or West. Not Chandler, Stojakovic or Julian. All of those Hornets scored at about the same rate as usual even if their numbers were up since they played more minutes per game.(That's still surprising considering the quality of Dallas's Defense) No, the increased efficiency was mostly generated by the Shooting Guards: Pargo and Peterson. Pargo's contributions were obvious as he pumped in 1.32 points for every shot he took, way up from the dismal .99 points he scored per shot in the regular season. He even performed amazing feats of acrobatics - even if they weren't intentional. Peterson's contributions largely went unsung and unnoticed. At least until now. The starting shooting guard scored 1.38 points per shot, up from 1.17 during the rest of the season. Way to go, Mo.
So what did the Hornets do wrong? In a word: Rebounding. We gave up 105.4 points per 100 posessions this series, which is a worse defensive efficiency than we posted during the regular season.(102.9) Normally that's to be expected when facing a team with a top 6 offense in the league, but the scoring difference can almost entirely be explained by the Hornets weak rebounding. Dallas Managed to grab 52.4% of the available rebounds, leaving the Hornets only 47.6%. Over the course of a game that translates to about two to three posessions. Posessions average out to be worth slightly more than a point usually - and that number matches almost exactly with the drop in our defense.
Looking at the numbers, there is one primary culprit for our rebounding decline: David West, who rebounded about 15% less per game than he did during the regular season. I'm not sure I can blame him for it, since frequently he was battling Dirk, who liked to take him away from the basket and also had about four inches on him in height. That's a tough job.
Tomorrow I'll tackle the Spurs and we'll see how we match up against the Defending Champs. I'm sure Bruce Bowen is already quaking in fear at the thought of facing Chris Paul again. I wish there was a youtube clip of Paul smacking him in the face "by accident" earlier in the season to go next to the one where Paul refuses to lie down and gets Bruce suspended.
Oh - and I have to say it once. Hey Pundits? Where's your playoff experience now? Next time give me some god damn basketball reasons the Hornets will lose!
Don't miss Ron's most recent Aftermath Post! It's a Monsta!


15 articulate comments post your own
atthehive
04/30/08 09:01 AM
Great point about our offensive efficiency. I didn't realize we were that good.
atthehive.wordpress.com #1
Ron Hitley
04/30/08 09:20 AM
Excellent recap. I felt bad for not giving Mo his due during the series. Everyone else was shining so bright that I kept forgetting him in my recaps. Looking forward to tomorrow's post, Ryan.
www.hornets247.com #2
Toney Blare
04/30/08 09:29 AM
I think we need to get Ryan Bowen back in the rotation and a lot more from Bonzi to try to get this rebounding situation under control. The Spurs will not let us get away with second shots.
www.neworleansnation.blogspot.com #3
Apple
04/30/08 10:01 AM
Hey, Ryan... You're so right about the pundits. They didn't even MENTION the Hornets when talking about the playoffs. And on the big NBA sites after a nice WIN theywould mention the Lakers, Spurs, Celtic, Cavaliers in the headlines but bury the Bees in analso-ran story. The Hornets got no respect from anybody. All of a sudden we're getting noticed. Guess who Sir Charles Barkley picked last night to win the Hornets/Spurs series?
appleita.blogspot.com/ #4
Mark
04/30/08 11:09 AM
I just quickly put together CP's assist-to-turnover numbers for the series. Not sure if they're historically good, but they're pretty fricken good. 10:1, 17:3, 10:1, 8:1, 15:0. Overall, 60:6, or an average of 10 assists for each turnover. And frankly, 15:0 is an infinite ratio, which HAS to be historically good. Since he played a total of 203 minutes in Round 1, that's an assist every 3.38 minutes, and a turnover every 33.8 minutes.
#5
Steve H
04/30/08 11:57 AM
I'm actually happy for Avery Johnson that he got the boot. I always thought he was a good coach and a class act. Since I can't see Dallas getting better anytime soon- just as well that he got kicked off that sinking ship. I understand the soon to be OKC Sonics might be looking for a new coach-HHHMMMMMMM.
#6
Mark
04/30/08 02:27 PM
I suppose I'm the other usual Mark... how are we to distinguish this? Our bees need to improve basketball EQ/IQ. I noted our spurts of bad rotation and matchups, leading to quick fouls. Also, keeping cool when Bruce Bowen undercuts you is a must. Can't expect a deep playoff run when your players are suspended due to bad behaviour (Ceiling Fan Repair Man and DX, I'm looking right at you!).
#7
saltandcarbon
04/30/08 03:13 PM
Great stats on CP3 assist to turnover ratio Mark number A (the other Mark I suggest be known as Mark letter 1, just for the sake of clarity). I have no corroborating stats on hand but my gut feeling is that he was PRETTY FREAKIN AWESOME!! I was looking at both SNash's and Frenchy's assist and turnover numbers and neither were anywhere near CP. Also, I'm not sure about giving Ryan Bowen more burn for the rebounding numbers but we def need another body down low suring up the boards with Duncan and Thomas going at it. Can we get Ely to play D and NOT SHOOT unless he has dunkage? Actually, maybe I just described Ryan... We need something anyway.
saltandcarbon.blogspot.com #8
mW
04/30/08 03:54 PM
I wonder if the poor rebounding might have had anything to do with trying to get back quick to guard against Dallas' fast break? If so, expect the rebounding to improve against the slower-paced Spurs.
hornetshype.com #9
Mark
04/30/08 04:16 PM
mW, I think it may have attributed to our interior defense needing some supplementation and intelligence. Rotation was horrendous for the most part, so Ceiling Fan Repair Man had to switch and commit touch fouls. Quick fouls meant sitting for Ceiling Fan Repair Man (goodness that gets hard to type!) and burn for Hilton, who is very foul-prone. We need to ensure proper defensive measures for Tyson to lock down low in the post (especially against Timmy Duncan, Oberto or whomever). Tyson himself stated something along these lines in an earlier quote. Though the Spurs don't rely uptempo, they're surprisingly effective in a full-court push, so watch for TP and Ginugly on that. And I don't expect to win on the boards for the most part, but definitely minimize damage on the defensive end by reducing Spurs' O rebounds. Geaux Hornets! (c) HornetsHype
#10
Ryan
04/30/08 04:39 PM
@mW - that would be the answer if it was offensive rebounding that suffered, i.e. the Hornetswere getting back on defense and not crashing the offensive boards. But actuallythe offensive boards stayed consistent, it was the defensive glass wherethe Hornetsgave up more rebounds than they did in the regular season.
www.hornets247.com #11
MarkF
05/01/08 05:02 AM
I defer to Mark's priority. I'll be MarkF, which, for the nosey, is the first letter of my last name (F***).
#12
Jazzman
05/01/08 06:14 AM
I was a big fan of Cedric Simmons in college and was wondering why I really haven't seen him on the court, there's no way Ely's better than Simmons. Also did Adam Haluska play a minute before he was traded to Houston.
#13
Ryan Schwan
05/01/08 06:56 AM
Cedric Simmons was traded before the season started to Cleveland. And Adam never took the court.
www.hornets247.com #14
Jessica
05/01/08 07:14 AM
Playoff experience, as it turned out, didn't matter as much as anticipated, but I hope that doesn't make the Hornets too confident. Part of why it didn't matter may have to do with the fact that Dallas didn't take advantage of this supposed asset, thus nullifying the "experience effect". Or maybe it does matter, in the Avery Johnson vs. Byron Scott sense. You guys have talented players and a phenomenal coach, and most importantly, your talented players mesh with your intelligent coach. There's another place where youth was beneficial (in addition to speed)since young players more often trust their coaches. Anyways, some of these offensive efficiency ratings could be misleading since the Mavs played so poorly. I am not in any way trying to take the credit from the players, who played amazing basketball, but San Antonio is a whole nother animal and I REALLY want you guys to beat them. The best part is, I think Byron is smart enough to make the adjustments. As I stated on a previous post, I am a Mavs fan, but there is no team left that I'd like to see win the Championship more than the Hornets (I've loved them since Charlotte). Dallas fans HATE San Antonio. They are our ultimate rivals, so tell CP3 he owes a win to us now too!
#15