Trail Blazers(5-3) @ Hornets(4-3)
Off Efficiency: Blazers 109.0(2nd), Hornets 104.9(9th)
Def Efficiency: Blazers 109.5(29th), Hornets 102.6(16th)
The Trail Blazers come into New Orleans on a four game winning streak, having picked off two patsies(Miami, Minnesota) and two decent teams(Rockets, Magic) during that stretch. The Hornets are set to meet them, having received an ugly drubbing at the hands of the Lakers. I'm hoping the Hornets come out angry, and end that streak now - though we know from last year that Portland can really get on a tear and rip off long winning streaks.
Games against Portland are always entertaining. Some members of the two teams seem to genuinely not like each other - and last year the Hornets had some furious meltdowns as a result. Something about Przybilla in particular really pisses off Chandler and West. There are some unsubstantiated rumors that they feel he has too many consonants at the start of his name, but that may just be me being irritated at having to look up how to spell his name every time we play them. Regardless, these battles get ugly, there are usually technicals involved, and last year, other than the Lakers and Utah, I always wanted to beat them more than anyone else. On to the teams.
Outside of the shot-happy Toronto Raptors, the Hornets and Blazers shoot more jumpshots than any other teams in the league, with each team generating 74% of their offense from jumpshots. Not really the most efficient way of scoring, unfortunately, but we should see a lot of deep shots raining down, which can be exciting.
So far this season, the Blazers have played well at home(3-0) and not so well on the road(2-3) as they unleashed a strong offense(2nd in the league). Their offense, however, is not based on high-percentage shooting - since they rank right in the middle of the pack in both effective FG% and True Shooting%. No, their offense is more predicated on precision and crashing the boards, as they rank in the top ten in offensive rebounding, and are 2nd in the league at not turning the ball over.
Problematic for the Blazers, they've also had the 2nd worst defense, allowing 109.5 points per 100 posessions. Considering their strong boardwork and turnover numbers, this is a little surprising, but could be explained by their reliance on Steve Blake and three rookies(Batum, Bayless, Fernandez) to defend for large portions of the game. LaMarcus Aldridge is also not the toughest defender around. The Blazers are hoping that Oden will erase some of those mistakes, and he should be back in the game tonight after getting his feet wet in 16 minutes against Miami on Wednesday.
Injuries
Blazers: Roy and Oden have nagging injuries, but both should be playing.
Hornets: Oh joy! Sean Marks has recovered! Peterson still has a sore knee, but should play too.
Positional Analysis
PG: Steve Blake v Chris Paul
Advantage: Hornets
Steve Blake is probably one of the most underrated point guards in the NBA. His defense may be mediocre, but it is intelligent, and that covers a plethora of ills. His offense is excellent. Blake handles pressure as well as anyone in the league, rarely makes a mistake, and can knock down open shots. He's not going to be an explosive pick-and-roll player, but when you have Roy, Aldridge, Fernandez, and Outlaw on the floor, you just need to be able to get the ball quickly into the attack zone and spot up. Blake does that. Of course, Paul does that and so much more, but still, I like Blake too.
SG: Brandon Roy v Morris Peterson
Advantage: Portland
Roys the all-around player everyone knew he would be coming out of college - but he's better at all of those skills than he was initially given credit for. He can defend, shoot, rebound, draws a good number of free throws, and his floor game is good enough that he can easily operate as a point guard. Morris can do a couple of those things.
SF: Nick Batum v Peja Stojakovic
Advantage: Hornets
Batum only plays about fifteen minutes, allowing Portland to run out Travis Outlaw and Rudy Fernandez as a deadly one-two scoring punch off the bench. His job is to be an active defender and run the floor. He alright at it, but he's still a rookie. As for Peja, I'd be shocked if he went 3-13 again. His shot is going to start falling.
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge v The Fluffinator
Advantage: Hornets
My impression of Aldridge has changed since last year. Last year I said Aldridge seemed to be a lot like David West earlier in his career - a tall jump-shooting machine with good touch. I'm not sure I can still say that though. West always had a nascent post game - one that he's used more and more each year. I've seen no inclination from Aldridge to get in there and mix it up. No post game and weak rebounding numbers for a guy his height equals David West Lite.
C: Joel Przybilla v Tyson Chandler
Advantage: Hornets
I guarantee there will be lots of arm flailing - lots of Chandler knocking away grasping hands, and lots of elbows being tossed. Both of these guys are going to get their fair share of rebounds, but if Chandler can keep his cool, he's easily better the Przybilla.
Bench
Advantage: Portland
For about six months I've had an urge to put together a post about Portland's Kevin Pritchard - a man who is celebrated as "teh best GM evah" by many. I'm not actually sure he is, considering the starting line-up I just went through. Is that really that good of a team? Even with Oden? I've not written anything yet because he definitely needs to be given more time to see how his stockpile of young players pan out, but so far Pritchard's hallmark has been skill with the press, a willingness to spend millions of his owner's money on typically low-reward draft picks, and extreme activity. His draft night binges remind me of that line from MacBeth. No, not "I dare do all that may become a man", I was thinking "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing".
Now, with that out of the way - let's go on to the actual bench - which is where Pritchard can stake his claim to excellence. The Hornets roll out two competent players in James Posey and Rasual Butler. The Blazers roll out shotblocking Greg Oden, clever scorer Rudy Fernandez, Athletic shooter Travis Outlaw, Channing Frye(he's Aldridge Lite, so does that make him David West Lite Lite?), speedster Jerryd Bayless, and a fast, clever ball-handler in Sergio Rodriguez. Two of them, Fernandez and Outlaw, play nearly starters minutes, and all are fairly effective in their way. That is a bench to be proud of. Clear advantage to the Blazers.
Enjoy the game. I've given up predicting the point spread.


24 masterful comments post your own
mW
11/14/08 12:58 PM
I'll post a spread: Hornets by 4. Any takers?
www.hornetshype.com #1
Niall Doherty
11/14/08 02:26 PM
I have no idea what to expect from the Hornets. I'm still down after the loss to LA. Things could get real ugly for us tonight in the second quarter when the starters rest.
Nice preview though, Ryan. Sounds like you've been studying literature with all this talk of consonants and MacBeth ;)
www.ndoherty.com #2
jksnake99
11/14/08 02:54 PM
Blazer fan here.
Regarding Aldridge, BlazersEdge game threads often include a lot of "ALDRIDGE GET YOUR BUTT DOWN LOW" posts because he does have a tendency to settle for jump shots. However, this season, he's shown a desire to post up more, and he's actually reasonably effective when he does. He's not as good as David West offensively, but he's good, and his length can cause havoc on D. His shooting percentages haven't been as good as Blazer fans would like so far this year.
Regarding Pritchard, he's celebrated by Blazer fans primarily for the 2006 draft (which he was in charge of even though he wasn't officially GM yet), in which he essentially turned Sebastian Telfair into the #7 pick (Randy Foye) and then swapped Foye for Roy straight up. He also swapped Tyrus Thomas for Aldridge, in another move that still looks like a steal for Portland. That draft essentially brought the franchise out of the doldrums, though you might note (correctly) that it wasn't too difficult to improve upon the Blazers previous draft in which they passed on a couple PGs from Illinois and Wake Forest that turned out ok. Pritchard looks even better to Blazer fans because of the people he followed.
The "low reward" draft picks you mention include Rudy Fernandez (24th pick, 2007 and currently 2nd among SGs in PER) and Nicolas Batum (looks like a steal at #25, 2008). Its true that Paul Allen's money affords Pritchard extra chips at the table, but he's turned them into some terrific players. He also continues to make shrewd draft day moves, such as moving into the #11 spot last year and getting Jerryd Bayless, who most considered to be one of the top 5 talents in the draft.
In summary, your preview is pretty good but you are unduly harsh on Aldridge and Pritchard, though you are correct to question the hype surrounding both of them-- it has been overplayd to some degree.
#3
usmcr3049
11/14/08 03:01 PM
Nice preview, going to be a good game tonight. I don't agree with your take on LaMarcus, he seems to going to the post more both last year and this year. A comparision to West earilier in his career is pretty on par. If you take West's numbers from 04-05 and compare them to LMA's rookie year, they are pretty close, both looks solid but didn't get much run. Then the following years for both, they blew up and starting to produce consistantly and therefore got more minutes. Each player avg about 17ppg and about 7.5rpg while shooting good percentages, (although west was better at 51%). They both seem to get their points in the same way, good jump shooters, who can play with their back to the basket. This year west is avg 19.3ppg with 7.4rpg, while LMA is avg 18.3ppg with 7.1rpg. They are much closer than you are suggesting.
www.blazersedge.com #4
Peter
11/14/08 03:03 PM
I agree the jury is still out on the Blazers, but can you really say that Pritchard's draft picks have been low reward? Brandon Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, Rudy Fernandez and Nic Batum (He is not amazing, but he is a late first round pick that is starting, and at 19 is already a solid NBA defender). I don't know of any other team that has added as many quality players through the draft in the last three years.
#5
Mikey
11/14/08 03:08 PM
We might see Devin Brown at point tonight. Probably not much of an upgrade, but couldn't be any less effective, and he might actually pass before 10 seconds left in the shot clock.
Yea you right Ryan! The Tyson Chandler and Joel "Tha Vanilla Killa" Przybilla matchup is always an entertaining one.
#6
ticktock6
11/14/08 03:13 PM
It has been pointed out to me that the Hornets have yet to win a home game in which I did not bring signage. So you know, guys, it's OK. Because it turns out it's not the turnovers and the missed threes and the lackadaisical first halves. It's ALL MY FAULT.
In other news, Rafer Alston will miss Saturday's game after being suspended for the "altercation."
I guess the Hornets will win now, because he's such an All Star and everything...
hornetshype.com #7
HornetsLose
11/14/08 03:42 PM
The Hornets may very well win tonight, but clearly you haven't seen much of LaMarcus Aldridge.
David West 2008 - 19.3 PPG, 7 RPG on 44.7% shooting
LaMarcus 2008 - 18.3 PPG, 7 RPG on 45.6% shooting
If anything this match-up is a draw.
So you might want to look at whatever bad info you have, and rethink that part of your post.
In addition your ridiculous rambling about Pritchard is silly. Perhaps you don't realize how childish you come across.
#8
jksnake99
11/14/08 03:58 PM
Ignore HornetsLose. There is obviously no need for name calling and that type of thing just makes Blazer Fans look bad.
#9
Ryan Schwan
11/14/08 04:03 PM
I expected some pretty negative response Jksnake99. Especially when it went up on Truehoop.
I'm not sold on Aldridge or Pritchard. They've been annointed a little too fast for my taste. I think we won't know for a couple years how good each are.
www.hornets247.com #10
emir
11/14/08 04:09 PM
wow your on a blog about a team you hate and your dissing them
you must have a great life not to be doing something you actualy care and love (and yes i love basketball and care if the hornets do good or bad)
anyway back to the reason i came here
i hoping we win this one but as we found out against the lakers if our 3s dont hit were going to be in trouble so someone better go help peja find his rythm
#11
Mark
11/14/08 04:13 PM
HornetsLose must be commended with their correct spelling and proper grammar. Respect.
and ticktock, I wouldn't be so confident in our proposed victory with Houston. Without Skip to my Lou, nobody else is riding on Tracy McGrady's coattail, ergo T-Mac is officially lighter, faster, and more mobile. Just check his statistics. When it was announced Alston was suspended, T-Mac's body fat percentage dropped 5%, mile time went down 3 minutes, and IQ went up 12 points. That spells trouble.
www.dogpile.com/ #12
Carson
11/14/08 04:42 PM
agree with jksnake. Pritchard channeled telfair, low draft picks, unwanted role players/scrubs, and zach randolph into Brandon Roy (all star), LaMarcus Aldridge (solid, potential to be very good), Rudy Fernandez (have you seen the guy) and other talents, all while getting Portland to go significantly under the cap in the next few years. Draft day binges? The only thing that would qualify is purchasing draft picks the last several years which have led to Fernandez, Rodriguez and Batum. Mostly small time deals that could have significant impacts down the line. (Rudy is already a strong contributor). Nothing Pritchard has done as GM could be considered reckless...unless you want to throw the Oden pick in there, and it remains to be seen what he can do. (hindsight is 20/20) While the team is not championship caliber just yet, the foundation is there.
Also, Bayless doesn't get any minutes whatsoever so mentioning him in the previews is really irrelevant..he isn't defending anyone for any portion of the game like the other two rookies.
#13
mW
11/14/08 04:48 PM
Dude, do you all remember the old Blazers? Every other weekend someone was getting arrested for having pot in their car or beating up their girlfriend. Even as of last year, the turnaround was amazing, talent aside. Oh yeah, and the old Blazers sucked. As of today, they have a better record than a legit title contender (us). I'd say that's pretty good.
www.hornetshype.com #14
Neil
11/14/08 05:13 PM
Another thing about our boy KP: in 2005, as director of player personnel, he lobbied then-GM John Nash to draft CP3 with the #3 pick. He was overruled, but now he's the GM, and where's Nash?
Here's hoping for a good game. Outside of Brandon Roy, CP3 is my favorite player alive. And if I weren't a Blazer fan, it wouldn't even be close.
#15
blacknoiseN@
11/14/08 05:22 PM
Scwhan seemingly give praise while actually demeaning the competition when talking about Pritchard. More Machiavellian than Shakespeare, except that it exposes a Portland neurosis that would make Freud proud.
How could Pritchard possibly be given credit for transforming Theo Ratliff and Sebastian Telfair into Brandon Roy, while leaving Minnesota with Foye in the process? What about trading Tyrus Thomas for Aldridge? Or picking up Rudy Fernandez, a year of James Jones, and Channing Frye for Zach Randolph and mega salary cap room??? Much ado about nothing???? Methinks not.
FWIW, the Blazer's aren't winning in spite of their starters. As for Aldridge vs. West, the ball don't lie:
Aldridge PER: 18.93
West PER: 14.99
West has some catching up to do. West light indeed.
#16
Cory
11/14/08 05:26 PM
Really schwan? If you knew followed basketball at all, you would understand why Pritchard is rightfully praised. He pulled off getting both Roy and Aldridge in the same draft (and your disrespect of Aldrige is laughable) while giving up Tyrus Thomas, Randy Foye, and Sebastian Telfair...how did that deal work out? He traded for Rudy Fernandez (a frontrunner for R.O.Y.) with the Suns for some cash....how'd that work out? He drafted unknown 19 year old Nicolas Batum from France...Batum is now starting on one of the best young teams in the league, is a great defender, and is only going to get leaps and bounds better. He traded Zach Randolph and his ridiculous contract to the Knicks....now Portland will have some of the most cap space in the league next year to spend on some great free agents. Portland is the 2nd youngest team in the league, is picked by most to finish 6th in the west THIS year, and will only get better with experience and free agents in the next couple years. If that is not applaudable, I don't know what is. Do some research before you spout off on something you don't know about. I can't wait to beat down the Hornets in the years to come and see you eat your words.
#17
Mark
11/14/08 05:45 PM
Pritchard should be praised, but did Ryan not mention that he's not sold... yet? A good year nets a good contract, but consistency keeps you in this league. LaMarcus is good (I'm not a fan of anybody from my alma mater), but you're comparing 7-8 games. So the significance of it is limited to 7-8 games. Amazing.
18.1 is a great career PER, and if LaMarcus keeps it up, he could be better than DX. But how many years has DX been holding it down? 5, going on 6. Lamarcus? 2, going on 3.
Numbers are numbers unless you identify the significance of them, blacknoise. And whoever comes out on top tonight does not affect who has the better career... yet.
www.dogpile.com/ #18
mW
11/14/08 05:48 PM
Wow. After last year's all-star game I fell in love with Roy and the Blazers never competed with us the rest of the year. I forgot that we hate each other.
www.hornetshype.com #19
Mark
11/14/08 05:55 PM
Oh, and by the way Cory, the youth of the team may be a detriment. Sure you guys have flexibility with salary cap, but don't think that LaMarcus, Roy, Fernandez, and other young gunners are going to renegotiate for the current running of ~5/3/1 million a year.
Unless they decide to ignore their market value, that cap space is going to be eaten up by reupping the current roster. So while I salute the movement Pritchard has made with revitalizing your organization, it's still business at the end of the day.
www.dogpile.com/ #20
jksnake99
11/14/08 06:06 PM
I have no idea what Cory's problem is.
#21
Cory
11/14/08 06:24 PM
I just said what my problem was, snake. This guy is spouting about Pritchard being "overpraised" when he apparently has no clue what Pritchard has done in Portland. Anyone who says Pritchard's "draft day binges" haven't been that great obviously doesn't know what they're talking about. And in response to Becky, Portland has all of their key players locked down past next year, which will give them plenty of cap space to snag a good free agent or two before they have to worry about renegotiating contracts.
#22
Eric
11/14/08 07:10 PM
Regarding Pritchard, yes the jury is still out. You can never judge a GM until they've been in place for at least 5 years IMO. BUT, you can't criticize his body of work to date. You mention his starting lining as something you use to question him. Keep in mind, Batum will be relegated to the bench when Webster is back and replace Pryzbilla with a healthy and in-shape Oden and you have a lineup that can match up with the best in the league. Then go back to the depth at bench and you have a dangerous team.
Plus the team has improved substantially each year he's been here (yes, not hard to do his first year but things are still getting better.) Take a .500 team last year and add 4 rookies with amazing potential (Oden, Rudy, Batum and Bayless) and you can't expect anything but years of playoff success for the Blazers coming up.
#23
Mark
11/14/08 08:11 PM
Well, I suppose I didn't specify what I meant. BRoy is franchise. LaMarcus is locked. The rest of the young gunners on your squad will want to sign an extension (most are active until end of '09-'10, and therefore may negotiate extensions for '10-'11 and beyond). Therefore, while the renegotiations won't kick in until BEGINNING '10-'11 season, it hinders a big-name free agency signing, since most want longer term contract negotiations, and deservedly so.
This especially being true because the Blazers might be more inclined to sign a veteran, and most veterans know the significance of a longer-term contract than short-term immediate deals. But in my opinion, you guys don't need much of a free-agency signing. Your core (when healthy) is as deadly as any team, and with time it will only serve in your benefit.
And yeah, I'm totally for Pritchard (there's no way you can't give no credit for what he's done immediately... although I honestly prefer the Jailblazers, honestly), but as long as you guys understand track-record, I think we can agree to disagree.
www.dogpile.com/ #24