The Hornets didn't go down without a fight tonight. They came into the house of the defending champs, a team that had won 13 straight games, and gave it all they had. The first half was nice to watch, with the Hornets playing some nice D, coming up with loose balls and running the break well. Chris Paul was all kinds of awesome and we had a few bench guys step up. But in the third the Celtics took care of the basketball, spread the floor and let Paul Pierce go to work. They opened up a nice lead and were able to keep us at bay all through the fourth. Down the stretch it was Boston coming up with all the loose balls, prolonging their possessions and getting to the free-throw line (not that they were hitting many from there). They were obviously the better team tonight and deserved the W.
It was definitely a measuring-stick game for us. We had won seven of eight, but, as I'm writing this, those seven teams we beat have a combined record of 49-86. So it was good to go up against an elite team and figure out where we're at. I was interested to see how much we'd progressed since that depressing loss to the Lakers exactly a month ago; the game which pretty much convinced me that the Hornets would not be a serious contender this season.
So, what's changed?
On the positive side, I like our intensity and effort much better now. We seem to have fallen back into the role of underdog and that works much better for us. Now guys actually seem to care on every possession, which wasn't always the case in the first few weeks of the season. David West is perhaps the best example of that. He didn't have the best shooting night tonight, but he was still a big factor out there. He was getting after it defensively, he grabbed a nice few boards, and it was really nice to see him taking that ball right at Kevin Garnett.
Our bench looked decent tonight, too, with guys like Sean Marks, Devin Brown and especially Hilton Armstrong giving solid minutes. I won't get too high on the reserves though until they put together a string of nice games, not just one every week or two.
That's about all the good news though. A month ago I figured our biggest problem was our crude offense, and we haven't made much progress in that regard. As Hubie Brown aptly noted during the game tonight, we rely far too much on Paul and West to create, and not enough on premeditated plays and principles to shake loose our other weapons. That was painfully obvious tonight with Peja getting up just six shots in 30 minutes. It was all well and good the past few weeks when lesser defensive teams would sag off him or fall for his fake backdoor cuts, but it takes a lot more than that to get him quality shots against the Celtics. And that doesn't just apply to Peja, but to every other guy on our roster who isn't an All-Star. We have plenty of guys who can score if we run some plays and get them open looks. It's when we ask them to get their points off kick-outs or by beating their man off the dribble, that's where we eventually run into trouble.
Let's get to some bullets...
- As mentioned, Hilton played well tonight. He started in place of Tyson, who seems to have adopted a 4-day workweek lately. (Just kidding, Ty. Get that neck right soon.) Armstrong shot just 3-9 from the floor, picked up 5 fouls and turned the ball over twice (though I'm sure I counted three for him), but I liked him out there because he brought some good energy and got after loose balls. He held his own defensively and made some strong moves at the other end. The Celtics started playing way off of him in the fourth quarter though, daring him to shoot. That didn't end well.
- I guess you could say CP got the better of his match-up with Rondo, Chris easily finishing with the better stat line. Rondo did get in some foul trouble though and that limited his minutes and assertiveness. I liked how Chris baited him into a few fouls. CP is real good at racing ahead of a guy when he's bring the ball up, then slowing down in a split second so his man runs right into the back of him. And of course he always sells that bump to the officials.
- Amazing fact brought up during the ESPN broadcast of the game: The Hornets have now played a total of 19 games this season. Meanwhile, the Portland Trail Blazers have played 16 road games already this season.
- Paul Pierce killed us in the third quarter. Probably wasn't the best idea in the world to have Peja guarding him, especially when the Celtics spread the floor so well and isolate that match-up. I would have liked to see Posey get more time guarding Pierce. He finally got that assignment in the fourth quarter and was able to slow Pierce's roll a bit.
- I love how Hubie Brown calls a halfcourt pass from CP to West "an 80 foot pass." What's the full length of the court? 94 feet, right?
- Our rebounding was horrible out of the gate, with Boston getting a bunch of second chances in the first quarter. We ended up not too far behind in rebounding though, the C's finishing with a 48-42 edge. Credit Sean Marks for reminding everyone else on the team how to crash the boards. He came in late in the first, and got busy on the glass right away. I honestly didn't know he was capable of stepping foot inside the key until then.
- No Antonio Daniels tonight, though he was suited up on the sideline. I'm guessing he'll be eased into it Sunday at Toronto.
- We gave up our 5 team fouls early in the third and fourth quarters, meaning a bunch of free throws for the Celtics. They shot 35 total, but made just 22. The final score could have been much uglier if they knocked down their usual percentage.
- Now I know why they call Glen Davis "Big Baby."
- That alley-oop that KG finished late in the fourth was pretty sick. Especially since it was right on Posey's head. Ouch. Chris Paul had a bunch of funky plays tonight, too. Loved that drop back bounce feed he had to West on the break.
- I don't suppose anyone skipped the game and watched Supernanny tonight instead?
That'll do. Hornets back at it on Sunday at Toronto. Early game that one, tipping at 11:30am Central. Don't forget about our jumbo-mega watch party. Should be a blast.


11 exceptional comments post your own
mW
12/13/08 12:05 AM
The CP-Hilton alley-oop was definitely way better than KG's. Of course, the question that is begged, as asked over at atthehive, is whether a CP to Hilton alley oop is still a Crescent City Connection?
www.hornetshype.com #1
two_tone
12/13/08 12:12 AM
yeah hilton showed his athleticism.
#2
At the Hive
12/13/08 04:32 AM
As much as the offense "looking" crude and bad argument has legs anecdotally, I don't think it's true. We've had the 4th best offense in the entire league, a very, very good 110.5 points/possession.
Improving on our 11th ranked defense would be a much bigger priority at this point. The offense may look off at points, but it's among the most deadly in the League.
www.atthehive.com #3
Niall Doherty
12/13/08 08:23 AM
Really? I didn't realize the numbers were still so high for us. Maybe fragile would be a better way to describe our offense then. We depend so much on Paul or West creating, that if one of those guys goes down with an injury or gets shut down by the opponent, we're in for a long night.
I realize it is a superstar league though, and you want your best players making big plays down the stretch, but we're asking our big guns to do that on almost every possession. My main concern is that we're putting too many eggs in one basket.
www.ndoherty.com #4
mW
12/13/08 08:25 AM
I think I agree with At the Hive. When our offence is clicking on all cylinders we get frustrated to the Nth Degree when it suddenly isn't. I don't think we "rely" upon jumpers per se, but how we hit them certainly effects the outcome. I mean, unlike, say, the Warriors, we have two players that can score at will from just about anywhere (DX, CP). So, yeah, we do need some other guys to hit some jumpers when they inevitably get good looks (from those other two).
Although, I agree that it was out of sorts last night. But, personally, I attribute that to the strange line-ups. And that's on Byron. For example, we were abysmal from3, and yet one of our best shooters from deep gets buried on the bench (Mo). I don't know.
Might be a bad time to hit Toronto, though. They looked on fire last night.
www.hornetshype.com #5
Mikey
12/13/08 09:13 AM
I'm going to give the credit to the Celtics #1 defense. They are not #1 in the league for nothing. They did not play well at all. With the Hornets missing Tyson, they should've had a 15 rebound advantage and won this game by 20+ points. They shot free throws poorly. But they buckled down in the 2nd half, took care of the ball, and ground out an ugly win. I thought this was a good game for our boys to see where they are. Based on what I saw, I'd say the Bugs made some progress since last month. Also, its no secret that the best three teams in the League right now are BOS, LA, and CLE. Remember we're 1-2 against those teams. We might not win a series, but I think we'd make it interesting.
I heard a quote after the Saints game on thursday night that I feel kind of applies to some of our guys in this game. I'll credit Saints Tackle, John Stinchcomb, with this one, "Never confuse effort with production." Just food for thought.
#6
Ron
12/13/08 11:05 AM
"is whether a CP to Hilton alley oop is still a Crescent City Connection?"
Maybe it's the Huey Long Bridge...
#7
Niall Doherty
12/13/08 03:41 PM
Just thinking more about our offense (sorry to keep going on about this but I really do believe it's the very thing that will kill us in the end), and I have a question:
How often do we see Chris Paul, or anyone else bringing the ball down court for the Hornets, actually call a play? How often do we raise a fist or some fingers, or yell out what play we're about to run? How often does Byron yell out a play from the sideline? Almost never, right?
It makes me wonder if we even have a playbook.
www.ndoherty.com #8
two_tone
12/13/08 05:33 PM
i feel your pain niall. we're not using what we have on this roster the right way. we should be running cutters when the shots are not falling to free up someone like peja. byron is known to be stubborn ,and doesn't make the neccessary adjustments. he really needs to open his eyes and do what it takes to develop julian. we lack athleticism and players who can create their own shot. when the celtics shot wasn't falling they took it to the hoop and drew fouls. it was a fairly close game. the celtics got timely rebounding and grinded out a victory.
#9
Roc217
12/13/08 05:46 PM
Question, Is this the offense that Byron ran in New jersey?
#10
johnny_utah
12/13/08 07:03 PM
Good question Roc217. Effectively Byron has in his hands the same if not similar assets as the Nets team did when they went that deep into the playoffs that season. The last half of the comments are bringing up points I was screaming and shouting to the screen during our inevitable loss yesterday. Develop juju to being a player who can create his own shot, make use of players like peja and mo more often, use different lineups that could see peja and posey on the floor together and dont just run to the ring and take an off shot, use the possession wisely and more carefully. There's 4 other dudes you can pass to.
#11