After talking about Julian Wright v Byron Scott, it's time to hit the game tonight.
Matchup: Hornets(39-22) @ Hawks(35-28)
Off Efficiency: Hornets 107.2(8th), Hawks 106.4(10th)
Def Efficiency: Hornets 103.4(10th), Hawks 104.8(15th)
The Hornets kick off a four-game road trip tonight, visiting Atlanta, which is the only above .500 team on the trip. It'll be a good test to see if the Hornets are just beating the teams they should, or if the team is actually gellin' like Magellen.
Unlike the Hornets, who have been making their run since the All-Star break, the Hawks have been breaking down. They started the season 21-10, went 6-10 in January, 5-5 in February, and are 2-3 in March. Much of that break down can be tracked to Atlanta's slipping defense and poor shooting over those two months, and if there is ever an optimal time to try and get revenge against them for that early season defeat the Hawks inflicted on the Hornets in New Orleans, it would be now.
I can't find anything anywhere about Peja's status for tonight. The last thing I saw was that he was feeling good and will most likely play, so we'll go with that assumption.
Injuries:
Hornets: None
Hawks: None
Positional Analysis
PG: Mike Bibby v Chris Paul
Advantage: Hornets
Bibby can hit threes and doesn't turn the ball over much. Otherwise, he sucks. Chris Paul, I hear, doesn't.
SG: Joe Johnson v Rasual Butler
Advantage: Even
Before you burst your belly laughing at this evaluation, let's actually take a look at what these two playcers have been doing over their last five(and both of them have been doing ablut the same over their last 15 as well)
Joe Johnson: 15.8 points, 4.8 rebounds, 6.8 assists, 1 steal, .4 blocks, 2.2 turnovers, 42% shooting, 5-17 from three, 18-23 from the line in 41 minutes.
Rasual Butler: 18.6 points, 5.4 rebounds, 1.0 assists, .8 steals, .8 blocks, 0.4 turnovers, 50% shooting, 10-25 from three, 17-20 from the line in 38 minutes.
Johnson is worse at everything but assists - where Johnson frequently is used as the defacto point guard for the Hawks, with Bibby serving as shooting guard. Butler's defense is at least equal, if not better, than Johnsons, although I have to admit Butler isn't stuck in a backcourt with a completely inept defender like Bibby. Now - Johnson is capable of bigger games than Butler, but for right now, I don't see much difference here. Even if we look at the season as a whole, for a team's leading scorer, Johnson is pretty poor. 1.17 points per shot is really bad for a primary offensive option.
SF: Marvin Williams v Peja Stojakovic
Advantage: Hawks
Despite William's weaker shooting percentage from three, he is a much more efficient scorer than Peja due to his ability to finish at the hoop and draw fouls. I've also been impressed by his improving defense, and that combined with Williams slightly better rebounding give him the nod over Peja.
PF: Josh Smith v David West
Advantage: Hornets
Josh Smith has never been a tremendous offensive player, typically getting his points on lots of crappy shots. This season, that continues, but his ability to create chaos on the defensive end has fallen apart. In all, Josh was a player I considered to be as good as David West last year. This year, he scores less, rebounds less, assists less, blocks way less, steals less, and generally impacts the game less, but still plays the same 35 minutes a game. Fluffy is better.
C: Al Horford v Tyson Chandler
Advantage: Hawks
Al Horford and Marvin Williams are the most efficient scorer in the Hawks' starting five. Of course, those two guys take the fewest number of shots. Makes a lot of sense, eh? I like Horford's game a lot. He's not the rebounder of Chandler, but he's not far from it, and he's got a solid offensive game, is a nice passer, and is a good defender. Tyson may be better at his specific categories: Defense, Rebounding and finishing the Oop, but Horford has a better all around game.
Bench
Advantage: Hawks
Maurice Evans, Flip Murray, and Zaza Pachulia are the three primary bench players for the Hawks, since Joe Johnson functions as the secondary point guard. Murray can produce points, Evans plays solid perimeter defense and knocks down open threes, and Zaza provides some nice, solid minutes as a back up big man. It's a well balanced bench. The Hornet's bench is a collection of non-scorers and shooters with iffy speed. Posey is decent, Julian might become more than decent, but the Hawks bench will be more effective tonight.
Enjoy the game.


10 magnificent comments post your own
Niall Doherty
03/09/09 12:29 PM
This just in from the Twitter machine: Marvin Williams is out tonight due to lower back pain.
http://twitter.com/atlanta_hawks/status/1300758496
www.ndoherty.com #1
Andrea
03/09/09 12:53 PM
No Marvin tonight? Dang it! I really like to watch him play. It's nice to see him slowly become the player the Hawks thought they were drafting in '05. If I had a vote for MIP, he'd definitely be considered for it.
Even with Joe Johnson, this is a game that we have a great chance to win if we:
defend well
rebound well
keep them off the line
limit turnovers
shoot about 40% or better
Do those things and we're well on our way to 8 in a row. The game tips at 6 our time and it's the first game of the night so fingers crossed that NBATV does live look-ins before they broadcast their scheduled game
#2
NOEngineer
03/09/09 01:45 PM
I think the key to our recent road success is starting the game with an emphasis on David West and Tyson rather than the 3-ball shooters. If we start off trying to bomb from downtown too often (even if we make a decent percentage) then we miss out on a lot of offensive rebounds and allow a lot of fast break opportunities for the opponent. I recall in the loss to Atlanta that we got blocked/denied alot inside, but hopefully we will have better stuff this time. If we can soften them up down low and play good defense early we should be able to follow the winning pattern we have established of late....
#3
mW
03/09/09 02:06 PM
I love your previews, Ryan, but again I think you are selling our bench short. We do not have the worst bench in the League. I mean, sure everyone complains and/or is disappointed in their bench. But they are not starters for a reason. Take the Spurs, put Ginobli in the starting line-up, and how good is their bench? Sure, we'd like to see them play better, but I'd take our bench over the Hawks bench amy day.
www.hornetshype.com #4
YoungFella
03/09/09 02:11 PM
I agree with mW. Our bench will be somewhat solid if Byron lets Mo Pete contribute upon his return.
#5
NOEngineer
03/09/09 02:37 PM
Meaningful ways to evaluate the bench are in short supply. I would be happy if we had 3 guys who never took a shot, but only set really great screens for, and made great passes to, the starters with whom they shared the floor, made defensive stops, didn't foul too much, and rebounded. I just wouldn't put more than 2 of them on the floor at the same time....
We have a good solid group of players like that that have enough intelligence to be efficient and help the scorers do their thing. Daniels, Marks, and Bowen are all solid players in that mold. MoPete has those qualities and brings the added ability to score with his game. Posey and JuJu are a mixed bag (lots of positives and negatives), with Posey more consistently positive. The other 3 have more negative than positive on most nights: Armstrong has excessive fouls and turnovers; Ely doesn't pass enough and fouls too much; Devin Brown doesn't pass enough and has too many turnovers. All three are too weak to the basket.
As Forrest would say, "Our bench is like a box of chocolates......"
#6
Mikey
03/09/09 02:50 PM
@ mW and YoungFella: I'm not defending Ryan's bench preview, but he'd give them more credit if they deserved it. Quite frankly, they don't. It seems like the only time any of them except Antonio Daniels score is when CP is in the game. I'd like to say the Hornets have a defensive 2nd unit, but "defenisve" implies that you won't give up a 7-0 run, and erase a comfortable lead in the 2nd quarter, at home, to a Milwaukee Bucks team that was missing it's best two players. They just have to be more consistent. And Mike, you're right, Peterson would help them some in the scoring category, and he could extend the defense. I'd like to see that sooner rather than later.
#7
Ryan Schwan
03/09/09 03:13 PM
Nice. Now I have a subject for my next post. Tomorrow I'll do a bench post. :)
I know the Hornet's bench isn't the worst in the league - but it's one of the worst on any decent playoff team.
Atlanta's bench outproduces the Hornets quite significantly, but I'll get into that tomorrow.
www.hornets247.com #8
bigindian15
03/09/09 04:03 PM
Haha I noticed the bench thing today too and decided not to comment on it. I guess I was the only one :P
We have one of the best starting 5's in the league, and possibly the most balanced. All we need our bench to do is not cough up the lead. We don't need them to be special. I think Daniels, Posey, Marks, and Wright/Brown/Peterson can totally do that against most teams. Also, each of them plays a LOT better when in there with the starters. So we can spot rest guys like we have been doing. Marks in particular seems to be beast mode when in there with other starters.
#9
NOEngineer
03/09/09 05:22 PM
I'm looking forward to your usual rational insight and analysis, with some well-carved statistics in support. I'd love to see a comparison of how our bench plays versus the other teams' reserves, and versus their starters. I'd also like to see how our starters fare against other teams' bench players and then starters. My feeling is that our starters did not abuse other teams' reserves like they should have this year.
#10