For my initial take on the Tyson Chandler-Emeka Okafor trade, take a gander at my previous post. For stats, keep readin'.

The casual fan will look at the raw numbers, see that Okafor has career averages of 14 ppg, 10.7 rpg, and 1.9 bpg and compare that to Tyson Chandler’s 8.2, 9.0 and 1.4 and assume that the Hornets had gotten the better of this deal. Even if you pick out individual best seasons, Tyson’s 11.8, 11.8 and 1.1 doesn’t really match up with Okafor’s best season of 14.4, 11.3, and 2.6.
That’s not an accurate representation however, due to Tyson’s exceptional defense, but at least offensively, it is a true statement. So first let’s take a look at the offensive numbers. For those of you who don't care about the numbers that much - skip to the end to get a summary.
Offense:
From 82games.com, here is Okafor’s shot detail information from last year:
| Shot | Att. | eFG% | Ast'd | Blk'd | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jump | 29% | .366 | 74% | 13% | 2.0 |
| Close | 48% | .531 | 71% | 15% | 4.8 |
| Dunk | 19% | .912 | 87% | 4% | 3.3 |
| Tips | 3% | .667 | 0% | 0% | 0.4 |
| Inside | 71% | .641 | 74% | 11% | 8.6 |
For comparison, here is Tyson’s details from last year, so you can get an idea of what sort of differences we can anticipate:
| Shot | Att. | eFG% | Ast'd | Blk'd | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jump | 9% | .160 | 75% | 12% | 0.2 |
| Close | 37% | .486 | 65% | 9% | 2.3 |
| Dunk | 34% | .937 | 89% | 0% | 4.0 |
| Tips | 20% | .276 | 0% | 2% | 0.7 |
| Inside | 91% | .605 | 72% | 4% | 6.9 |
What leaps out immediately is Okafor is much more willing and capable of taking a jumper. (he probably shouldn’t because he’s pretty bad at it, but at least his futility from range is nothing as compared with Chandler’s.) Okafor is also an accomplished finisher at the rim, as his dunk and close conversion rates are excellent. That’s comforting because Paul needs big men who can finish the pick and roll at the rim and Okafor has that ability in spades.
Okafor’s height(6-10) does lets him get blocked more often, but it matters less because he still finishes at a high rate. He also almost never gets tip-ins. For a player who averaged 3.4 offensive rebounds a game last year, that’s a low number. I think we can expect to see him rip those balls down off the rim, and then go back up.
As for passing, Okafor is pretty weak. He was 60th among centers at assist rate, and his turnover rate was 33rd, though that’s still a big improvement over the 53rd ranked Chandler. Particularly, when you take into account the fact he takes quite a few more shots than Chandler attempts.
In summary: Okafor takes more shots, hits about the same percentage, and turns the ball over less than Tyson. I can dig that.
Rebounding
One of the primary areas of concern last year was rebounding. With this acquisition, the Hornets should get some help. Last season, Okafor generated a rebound rate of 19%, good for 13th in the NBA. That number is consistent with what he’s done the past three years, so we can expect it to vary little. By way of comparison, Chandler generated rebound rates of 20.7, 19.5, and 16.4 over the last three seasons
Defense
Here’s where Chandler’s departure hurts the most. Chandler was an Elite defensive center. Okafor can be classified as merely "solid", as the good blogger Brett Hainline of Queen City Hoops said in his end of season evaluation of Emeka Okafor.
Hainline has a great stats page on his blog, and rather than paraphrase his stuff, here’s the link to his chart describing how Okafor did defending Centers, Power Forwards, and in general. The chart tells you what was expected from a player going against Okafor, what they actually did against him, and the net change.
If you’d rather not study the chart in detail, here is its conclusions in a nutshell: Okafor makes opposing players score and shoot slightly less well, draw slightly fewer free throws, but do slightly better on the boards than normal. He provides a net improvement of about a 0.5 point of PER. Tyson provided a net improvement of 3.7 PER. That's huge.
Summary of the Post:
- Chandler is an A+ defender and a C offensive player,(offender?) though that is mitigated by his injury risk.
- Okafor is a B- defender and a B offensive player. Okafor has played 81 and 82 games the last couple seasons.
Next post, I’ll get to the financial impacts of the trade – since we all know those matter hugely.


15 inspiring comments post your own
saltandcarbon
07/28/09 02:31 AM
The thing I'm happiest about in this trade is the commitment it indicates from the front office. They are trying. Against the tide of finances, the handicap of a small market and some dubious (in hindsight) contracts, they are trying to keep a competitive team together built around our two all stars. Whether this trade was engineered or lkanded in their laps, bravo to the administration for keeping the dream alive.
#1
StefanC
07/28/09 03:19 AM
That was a VERY generous C you gave to Tyson Chandler's offensive game. I hate to see Chandler leave, but it's for the best.
I'd also like to add that I've met Emeka Okafor here in Vegas & he sure is a nice guy. I've seen him twice at Airports too around the US. You can't miss him.
#2
berlinhornets
07/28/09 03:48 AM
@stefanC I agree with your comment on chandlers offensive game. okafur can do a lot on his own and with CP feeding him, I actually think an All Star nod might not be out of the realm of possibilities. That is quite intriguing, having three players with All Star potential (allright CP is more than just potential). The Bees have to switch to better team defense and the defensive advantage had TC wont be too big.
I really liked everything Tyson brought to the table and that was more than just states. The chemistry and energy he provided were huge for the Hornets, in particular in 2007-2008. But I like that the FO tries to go with something more reliable and tries to win now. Our nucleus just got younger and more talented for the foreseeable future. Lets just hope they find a decent backup. I would love to get Warrick, but he might out of the price range. A solid and price consciouse solution might be Sean Marks. I like what he did for us last season adn wouldn't mind getting him back.
#3
Mikey
07/28/09 08:46 AM
Basically this move saves you $2 million this year ($1 million plus the luxury tax penalty) for a minimal upgrade at the position, and I'm sure Ryan will get into the weeds about what this deal does for the Bees down the road. The thing I'm a little peeved about is that the Hornets still have not addressed their #1 non-financial issue, which is front line depth. Trading centers does not improve your depth; then again the argument can be made that 82 games played versus less than 40 is a depth improvement in and of itself. The Hornets are still missing a piece though, IMO.
Two final thoughts:
1. Maybe Okafor can actually catch that bass, who knows.
2. I'm sure the Hornets have made a serious downgrade in Ticktock6's hottness factor.
#4
ticktock6
07/28/09 08:56 AM
Mikey-- No way, man! In my NBA Hottie bracket voting , the Finals matchup was New Orleans vs. Charlotte. http://hornetshype.com/wp/2009/04/15/hottie-baller-finals/#more-2889 Emeka's kind of a hottie too.
On the basketball side, I'm just so relieved we didn't dump TC for scrubs or cash that I can't help but be happy about this trade even though I didn't want to lose Chandler. I thought he could recover and come back strong. I hope he does for the Bobcats. If you accept the fact that, for whatever reason, the front office was set on trading him, then this is one of the best possible outcomes. I think what happened probably hurt and soured his feelings toward management, even though he still loves his teammates and says that's all that matters. It's like being fired and then they call back and change their minds-- you'd always have that in the back of your mind, eating at you, that they tried to do that. So part of me is glad that he and the team can both move on.
hornetshype.com #5
bigindian15
07/28/09 10:33 AM
Yeah, Chandler was a D on offense at best, an F when CP wasn't in the game. Don't you guys remember the occasional post up, followed up a spin, followed by the ball either hitting the side or the back of the backboard at 45 mph on the shot?
Okafor also has big game experience in college, which is always nice. Plus, he didn't get to compete for a title at ALL while in Charlotte, so I like to think he'll be really motivated in New Orleans now that he's on a team that has 2 all stars and a chance to compete in the West.
@Mikey: I kinda disagree, it actually might help the front line depth. Well, not the depth per se, but at least who we target. Now we don't really need a big man with post moves, we just need a defender/rebounder. Because now we have two legit post players down low, so if at all times West or Okafor is in (or at least most of the time), we still have someone to go to. Last year, when West went out, we had no threat down low, so we needed someone to be able to come in and score off the bench. We don't need that anymore (at least not as much) with Okafor giving us 2 legit post players
#6
DrewS
07/28/09 10:38 AM
This seemed like an all-in type move. The Hornets are tied up with some expensive salaries for the next few years and have very little wiggle room to acquire those missing pieces. I admire the front office's testicular fortitude for pulling the trigger on this move, but I think doing a salary dump with TC this year and waiting for next year to add some missing pieces might have been better in the long run. I guess this is it though, all or nothing the next couple years for CP and Co.
#7
joe
07/28/09 11:51 AM
I also agree that this shows us that this team is more focused on improving than cutting the costs. Okafor is a very good pickup for the team. And we all seem to forget about the chris paul effect that it will take on his numbers i predict at least 16-17 points a game. Thats the best part about the deal. I cringed whenever chandler tried to post up someone, especially on a mismatch in his favor where he couldn't take advantage and just lost the ball
#8
Andrea
07/28/09 12:41 PM
Not much for me to say on this one until after the physicals
#9
stormsurge
07/28/09 12:57 PM
They havent done the physicals yet? That comes as a surprise. I havent read anywhere that this is contingent on anything. Considering Tysons last trade, I imagine that would be front and center (pardon the pun)
www.stormsurgephoto.com #10
Juncti
07/28/09 01:03 PM
How much are these stats influenced by Chris Paul? I would imagine a good chunk of Chandlers performance is due to Paul's abilities on the court, and this boost in performance would now transfer over.
#11
corndeaux
07/28/09 06:22 PM
With or without Chandler, the cap was screwed for the Hornets this year- see Peja, Peterson, and Posey. Okafor's deal is longer, but for a capable starting center it is not outrageous. Here is a list of Hornets salaries for the next few years:
http://hoopshype.com/salaries/new_orleans.htm
#12
Zwie
07/28/09 07:25 PM
So i was checking out one of the bobcats blogs.....
and needless to say..
they are pissed...
i didnt read one comment where someone wrote they were happy this deal went down...
lets just pray, that they stay pissed and we stay content.
http://www.bobcatsbaseline.com/blog/?p=957
#13
Ryan Schwan
07/28/09 09:44 PM
Brett Hainline of Queen City Hoops isn't pissed. But he's an even-keeled dude.
www.hornets247.com #14
winze
07/28/09 11:26 PM
"# This move basically states that George Shinn is more willing to spend on a winner than Bob Johnson.
We ran Shinn out of town because he was cheap. What kind of b.s. karma is this?"
I LOL'ed so hard at this
#15