Allen Iverson has walked away from Memphis in a huff, making him a free agent once again. Some folks in the comments here and on other sites have been wondering if the former league MVP would be a good fit in New Orleans. Let's see...
The case for Allen Iverson
Iverson didn't enjoy his time in Memphis because the Grizzlies wouldn't give him a starting job, but the Hornets would have no trouble accommodating him there. After all, the shooting guard position has been a huge headache for New Orleans this season.
Morris Peterson was the starter for the first six games, but failed miserably at both ends of the floor and found himself relegated to the inactive list. Devin Brown has been the starting 2-guard since, and while he has fared better than expected, he has no business averaging more than five or six minutes per game in the NBA.
Then there's the rookie Marcus Thornton, who has repeatedly shown flashes of brilliance and will likely earn the starting job soon if the roster stays as is. However, Thornton was a second-round draft pick, so best not set your expectations too high for him.
So, the Hornets could offer Iverson a starting job, and he'd be happy. He could take all those shots that Devin Brown and Marcus Thornton had been taking. He would demand a lot of defensive attention, thereby opening up the lane for West and Okafor to go to work. After a few weeks, Chris Paul would return from injury and find relief not having to carry so much of the scoring load. The Hornets would get hot and make the playoffs despite their poor start to the season. New Orleans Arena would be full to the rafters as CP3 and the Answer put a scare into some contenders in the West.
And then you'd wake up...
The case against Allen Iverson
Sorry, folks. Dreaming about it is fun, but it's just not going to happen. Three reasons why:
Money
I'm sure Iverson could be had for cheap, but the fact is that the Hornets are still over the luxury tax threshold. That means that George Shinn would be on the hook for double whatever Iverson would sign for. I don't see him taking that hit for a wildcard like A.I.
Character
The Hornets have been consistent about bringing in high-character players ever since Baron Davis threw a tantrum and had to be traded for almost nothing back in 2005. Yes, we have seen the odd Mike James or Bonzi Wells added to the mix since then, but those guys were small pieces; role players who could easily be held in check by the likes of Chris Paul and David West. Allen Iverson is a whole different story.
Team game
In hindsight, the whole idea of Iverson with the Hornets would have made a lot more sense a week ago, when Byron Scott was still coach. Scott relied heavily on the pick and roll and individual brilliance to win ball games, not worrying so much about running actual plays. Iverson would have fit in nicely. But now with Jeff Bower and Tim Floyd calling the shots, we're seeing more ball movement and spacing in the Hornets offense. Nobody is being asked to dominate the ball and make something out of nothing. Unfortunately, Allen Iverson needs the ball in his hands to be effective, and he has repeatedly demonstrated that he's not willing to change his style of play.
Three strikes. Iverson's out.


7 fluffy comments post your own
SaveYourBoredom
11/18/09 02:09 PM
Last night, our three shooting guards scored somewhere around thirty points. A good night, yes, but realistically, is Iverson going to single-handedly give us that?
I think not. We should stick with what we have.
#1
downtowndave78
11/18/09 02:37 PM
Championships are won by teams. Iverson doesn't understand the concept of a team, so I don't think that is a direction we should take. The only positive I could see from it would be the draw it would bring to the games, but I am still against it.
I wonder if Iverson really just turned his back on Memphis after the season began, or if he was used as bait to land ticket sales before the season began?
#2
Niall Doherty
11/18/09 02:45 PM
Yeah, the Memphis thing baffles me. It's almost like they never sat down with Iverson during negotiations and asked him how he'd feel about coming off the bench, then were shocked and amazed when he wasn't happy about a reserve role.
www.ndoherty.com #3
mW
11/18/09 02:56 PM
Grrrr....I had an articulate, well thought out comment, but your site ate it. Basically, this, when we could trade for him and dump something in the process of getting him, I was all for it. But now, especially considering we'd have to pay him and the player we cut to make room for him, no way.
www.hornetshype.com #4
LSUhornet
11/18/09 03:44 PM
@Niall
That's why they're the Memphis Grizzlies. Most people would never think of trading Pau Gasol for Kwame Brown, but they pulled the trigger on that gem.
I feel kind of bad for AI. He's obviously delusional in regards to his value on a basketball court, but he certainly still capable of contributing. He took the fall for Detroit falling apart, when all signs after the fact point towards the coach being responsible for most of the fault. I don't even remember Dumars catching much flack on that one last year. (Certainly not to the degree that Bower was getting bashed after the Hornets dared to fire Byron Scott.) Like mW said, if we could have picked up Allen in addition to dropping one of our guys in the process I was all for it, but signing him now makes little sense.
#5
Joe Gerrity
11/18/09 05:32 PM
First priority should be a backup center.
I hardly think adding another shoot first old guy to our roster makes sense (Devin....)
#6
420ftJesus
11/18/09 09:05 PM
I see this team as one in flux: new coaches, new players, new system to accomofate all these. You can't take a big risk and a big investment without having the house in order.
In other words, no Iverson.
#7