The Hornets played some of their worst basketball of the season to fall into an early 21-point hole tonight in Dallas, but clawed back into the game thanks to some unlikely contributions from the likes of James Posey, Julian Wright and Hilton Armstrong. In the second half it was Chris Paul putting on a show and leading the troops, but the Mavs proved to be the better team in the end, executing enough to keep the Hornets at arms length.
94-90 the final score. Hornets fall to 10-13.
Defense
The Mavericks came out and got whatever shots they wanted in the first quarter. The only thing the Hornets did well was keep the ball out of Dirk Nowitzki's hands, but in doing so they seemed to forget about the other four Mavericks on the floor. J.J. Barea got in the lane untouched several times, Erick Dampier got deep under the basket for easy scores more than once, and the Hornets transition defense was non-existent.
It all changed in the second quarter when Posey, Chris Paul and Darren Collison decided to apply some defensive pressure and started forcing the Mavs to turn it over. Really, the only change in the defense was the intensity, which proved contagious and resulted in easy baskets at the other end.
The Hornets kept much of that defensive intensity the rest of the way, making Dallas work a lot harder for their baskets. There were some costly blown rotations in the fourth quarter though, two of them leading to big threes for the Mavs.
Still, it was nice to see the Hornets make some progress on the defensive end. Allowing just 59 points in three quarters is nice work.
Chris Paul
Chris Paul made plenty of big plays and kept the Hornets close in the second half. He played 40 minutes despite showing signs of that ankle bothering him again in the fourth quarter, and finished with 20 points, 16 assists, 5 steals, 4 rebounds and just one turnover. At least three times tonight he had me picking my jaw off the floor after a no-look feed or a sneaky steal. In five games since returning from injury, he's averaging 15.8 points, 14 assists, 4.8 boards and 3.4 steals.
Having noted all of that, this next sentence might seem a little misplaced: Chris Paul is part of the problem.
I say that because I don't see him buying into what Jeff Bower and Tim Floyd are trying to do with the offense. We saw some nice progress made towards more ball movement and less pounding when Paul was out injured, and I assumed that would continue when CP came back. Unfortunately though, I'm seeing the offense regress into Paul dribbling most of the shot clock away before launching a contested jumper while his teammates stand and watch.
Of course, there's no denying Paul's brilliance, and with the way he's been shooting this season those contested jumpers aren't necessarily bad shots. The problem is that the Hornets can only go so far with Chris Paul dominating the basketball. For the Hornets to be a real threat offensively, they need everybody involved, multiple passes on each trip down the floor, not just one guy prodding the defense for 15-20 seconds. That requires too much of Paul and too little of everyone else, including the guys playing defense.
Chris has been responding to the team's poor performance by playing hard, playing hurt, and getting on his teammates even more so than usual. I'm thinking what would serve him and the team better is to realize that his herculean efforts aren't adding up to more W's. A smarter approach is needed.
Bullets to finish this out...
- Barea and Nowitzki are a nice combo on the pick and roll/pick and fade. Barea can turn that corner and speed toward the basket, while Dirk can't be given much space when he opens up after the pick. Tough to guard.
- Not to give too much credit to the opposition, but the Mavs also did a nice job on David West tonight, rarely letting him post up without sending help immediately.
- Hard to complain about Emeka Okafor's lack of playing time in the fourth quarter again when Darius Songaila has been playing so well. I'm thinking it might be nice to see Songaila in there for West though so we have that big defensive presence down the stretch.
- Hilton Armstrong made several nice plays tonight, on both ends of the floor. Most surprising were his nifty moves inside for scores. Not often we see him gather the ball and move his feet like that. I'll enjoy it for what it was, because it's unlikely we'll see another performance like that from Hilton any time soon.
- From my notes in the third quarter: "6:53 Devin Brown charge on break. But of course."
Hornets home to face the Pistons on Wednesday.
UPDATE: Mr. Kennedy's got your post-game Journal report, and here's the game highlights from NBA.com...


22 masterful comments post your own
berlinhornets
12/15/09 05:15 AM
What I take away from this game is that there is still a lot of poise within this team when they want to and the starters are not the ones with teh poise. The last couple of years I was always fearful of the bench players coming in, now it is quite the opposite. I cant wait for the guys from the bench. this time even JuJUu and Hilton who had a resepctable outing. DWest is killing us out there right. Lethargic and slow on both ends of the court and not even hitting his shots - there is like no value. What about the bold move of startin Darius, maybe that gives West a wake-up call. I would also rather see Paul playing the off-guard more with Collison on the court. Everytime that happens there is more ball movement and Paul is a better shooter (be it as spot up shooter or with a couple of dribbles) than Collsion.
By the way, I love this site. All around awesome work.
#1
flowerfeeder
12/15/09 06:37 AM
Glad to see someone else bummed out about DWest's performance so far this year. I too believe Darius should get the starting position.
www.myspace.com/noroomforsaints #2
downtowndave78
12/15/09 08:26 AM
I have been critical about Bower's substitutions for the past few games, but I am somewhat more content with last night's decisions. Songalia was defending and dropping shots, so I think he earned his place on the court. The only decision I question is putting West back in the game after such a bad outing. However, the guy is a two time All Star, and he carries a little more clout than your average player and I can accept that decision. I don't think we should even consider starting Darius.
It would have been nice to see JuJu and Hilton get some more time in the second half. I believe you should reward/ play the players who "bring their total game", and they both, especially Armstrong, brought it last night so let them play.
I have to disagree with you Berlin. I do not remember many games this season where the second unit has out performed the starters. I recall many games where Omeke and Peja were on fire in the first half and barely used in the second half, but I think our starters have done a good job this season. In fact, the only constant bright spot for the second unit (with an emphasis on constant) has been Songalia. Posey has had more off games than on. Thornton is awesome, but he brings a lot of rookie mistakes (1 blown fast break a game) that he'll correct over time. Collison played better when he was starting, but he is still very solid. I think the second unit has more energy at times, and they are funner to watch perhaps, but I think the stats from individual games will show that the starters have been playing better. I could be wrong though.
After watching JuJu, Hilton, Thornton, and Collison last night I thought about the second unit run-n-gun we blogged about week ago. Hmmmmmm......
I agree with the offensive analysis Niall provided above about Paul's lack of ball movement. Hopefully, this is an issue of routine rather than ego.
#3
downtowndave78
12/15/09 08:33 AM
Oh yeah... I forgot to ask. Do you guys think that Paul's last shot of the game was rushed? Was seven seconds enough time to create a better look and get some bodies on the paint and have a real chance to win, or was an immediate contested shot the only way of winning the game?
#4
Ryan Schwan
12/15/09 08:39 AM
I don't think Paul's shot was that great, no. In fact, I think both he and West had a combined 4 "Hero Shots" where they took a less than optimal jumper during crunch time. Only one went in.
I'm not surprised they took them, but I'm used to them trying to generate those types of shots off a two-man game on the wing. That tends to be much more effective, so it surprised me to see how each of them tried to generate those shots almost alone.
www.hornets247.com #5
berlinhornets
12/15/09 08:58 AM
to be honest, the comment about the bench was more subjective. I didnt check the stats to compare them. It probably is the truth that i think that the bench is more fun to watch. This probablystems from the feeling that nothing really big is happening this season (maybe not even the playoffs). I hope I am wrong, but Id rather see the young guns run and learn and entertain me, than have some of the starters not being effective and making me not want to watch them.
@downtown I give you the reluctance of starting Songalia over West (I honestly wouldnt do it either), but somethings gotta give. Something has to be done to wake West up. Maybe increasing Songalias role more on the expense of Wests playning time might help.
What I saw a couple of times in the Dallas game and made me mad about West was the way he was getting the ball for the inbound pass after Dallas scored. Of course you should'nt celebrate or anything, but speed it up a little. He usually slouches to get the ball and lets his head hang for a moment.
#6
downtowndave78
12/15/09 10:11 AM
I agree with your assessment of West Berlin. I am not suggesting we do what I am about to mention, but I sometimes wonder if West is going to be the trade bait to unload some bad contracts from this team.
#7
ticktock6
12/15/09 10:42 AM
I agree about Chris Paul, and with True Hoop (who posted some thoughts on this just now). The thing he has to give up to help this team is those long jumpers. A lot of times they're contested, because the guys on the floor with CP are just waiting for him instead of moving off the ball. Nowhere was this more apparent than on the last two plays where the Hornets had the potential to take the lead/tie the game. Both times Chris opted to shoot the three himself. Can he hit them? Sure. But he was 0-2 in this game. He has Posey (3-6), Peja (2-5 but we know that doesnt matter for Peja), and Devin (2-4), just to throw out some options. (OK, Devin wasn't on the floor, but he is an option, and as much as I rag on him he had hit some threes earlier). And everyone standing there while CP jacks two threes with a taller guy in his face is really the right play?
I also wondered whether the coaches don't want to tell him no. After getting repeatedly burned by his man in the first and falling into a huge hole, I was startled to see how long he remained on the floor. Yes, he eventually became part of the group that got the game back in hand. But the Hornets offense had completely come to a halt, and CP being on the floor with Collison just meant Thornton couldn't come in. I thought his movement would have helped shake things up. That's kind of what you have guys like Thornton and Devin FOR, driving to the basket and creating a little chaos when jumpers aren't falling.
And I've now said two backhandedly positive things about Devin Brown in one comment, so I think I'll stop. I feel weird enough already.
P.S. At open practice the other day they had Thornton and Collison shooting long jumpers, then threes. I think what they really need to do is stick Hilton or Marks under a hoop with their hands up and have Buckets repeatedly run at him on the fast break. When he can finish more of those, he'll be ridiculous.
hornetshype.com #8
pinoyballah
12/15/09 10:46 AM
i happened to just catch the last 20 secs of the game, yelled at the screen when paul chucked that 3 pointer at the end...i know we were down by 4 but one extra pass would have been a hell of a better shot than what he threw up.
paul's numbers have been awesome since he came back. One thing i've notice is that his assist numbers are back to the norm unlike the beginning of the season when he relied more on his scoring. yes we are 3-2 since cp3 return, but if you look at the total point in those games we have yet to break 100. (anywhere from 90-98 pts). the six games before that, we hit >100 four times. which means cp has the ball too long in his hands that we are getting less possessions per game.
I understand its cp's team, but this is where coach bower needs to implement the system he ran when cp3 was out (more ball movement). the hard part is getting will paul buy into it.
#9
Kevin
12/15/09 10:49 AM
Oh, and not to mention running the floor and attacking the bucket.
He's the best on-ball defender on this team, he's the most athletic player on this team and he brings great intensity and another rebounder... what excuse is left as to why he doesn't play more?
#10
Kevin
12/15/09 10:49 AM
Julian Wright came in and did exactly what he's done all season - rebound well and play great defense. Last night, just as when he was starting, he wouldn't see the floor in the second half, especially down the stretch when stops were needed.
Absolutely ridiculous. Why does this organization continue to blackball him? I thought Byron Scott left town...
#11
lionzion
12/15/09 10:53 AM
Spurs guy here.
I watched the Hornets without Paul and then last night, with Paul playing. I really really gotta say, I echo your sentiments. The hornets without Paul surprised the hell outta me. They were playing hard and it looked like everyone was playing and thinking out there. And that rookie pg seems like a nice christmas present.
Now yesterday, I was interested in a Mavs-Hornets game outcome. And it was just bad bad play by Paul in the last 2mins. Absolutely no game-IQ used there. And I used to credit Paul with good game decisions. My only point : Songaila! Now I don't know much about this guy. Last night was the first time I have ever noticed him. And one couldn't help but notice. The guy shoots super quick, and everything was nothing but net, and his mannerism on the court was one of supreme confidence in his shot. My mouth was open wondering how come I have never noticed this guy before. Heard the name for sure, but always dismissed it. Songaila was giving effort and very active off p&r's and with such a stroke going, he should have been fed, repeatedly ad nauseam. I don't like Paul for his antics on the court, though as a bball player I appreciate his talent and feel for the game. That second part took a hit last night with his poor decision making in my opinion.
#12
Mikey
12/15/09 10:54 AM
On the other side of the coin, you cannot be too happy if you're a Maverick. Let's face it, the Hornets suck on the road, and are marginally playoff calibur at home. The Mavs had a chance to make a statement last night, but the only statement the Mavs made was they cannot sustain a high intensity of play. The only reason the Mavs didn't completely fold was they were playing at home.
I think, at this point, most of the Hornets' road problems are mental. The Bugs got back in the game last night because they know they can beat the Mavs on any given night. If that were the Jazz running free in the lane in the 1st quarter, I think the Hornets lose by 40.
#13
ticktock6
12/15/09 11:04 AM
I wouldn't be happy if I were a Maverick either. You lost three out of four quarters. And turned the ball over tons. Which just goes to show that, for two games in a row now, a bad five minutes--- as in, REALLY, bad, like giving up 6 straight threes to the Knicks or spotting the Mavs a 17 pt first quarter lead-- has been the only thing between a win and a loss. That's two straight games you outplayed the other team except for five minutes. I'm just shaking my head at this point. For a team that can play well to give up massive quick quick runs because they chose not to play well... argh. It's very frustrating to watch. Really this happened in the Minnesota game too, although the Hornets did grab a win after going down 16.
hornetshype.com #14
Niall Doherty
12/15/09 12:25 PM
@ Kevin: JuJu played great last night, but he's been on the bench for good reason this season. He was given plenty of opportunities in the first few weeks and couldn't deliver.
@ ticktock: "I also wondered whether the coaches don't want to tell him no." That thought crossed my mind about Chris, too. He's a superstar while Bower is a mild-mannered rookie head coach and Tim Floyd hasn't had much luck winning over NBA talent before. I'm not all that confident that they can persuade CP to play a certain way. My hope is that Chris will figure out for himself that getting the ball out of his hands is the best plan.
www.ndoherty.com #15
icebird
12/15/09 12:43 PM
Here's a suspicion I have: when Paul was out injured, everyone else took more responsibility for creating the offense. When Paul came back, in the crunch situations, he feels "I have to make something happen" and the rest of the team waits for him to make something happen. When you've spent several years in a mindset where you hang back waiting for Paul to do something, it might not be easy to change that overnight.
In retrospect, I wonder if it would have been better to bring Paul off the bench in his first few games back? I'm probably dreaming that it would ever happen, but it might have been better for both Paul's ankle, and the team.
This year's Hornets may not be Lakers-level contenders, but I think they've definitely underachieved compared to what they're capable of (even allowing for injuries). I hope Sean Marks recovers from his shoulder injury soon - while I don't think he will have a huge impact on the team, he does occupy a niche that needs filling (back-up rebounder and defense guy).
#16
Jib
12/15/09 12:51 PM
Bower's substitutions were a lot better, though I would have liked more Juju just because he was finishing and playing good defense, but that is a good point, Niall. The only other problem, that air ball by collison that was put back by darius, the lineup was him, west, collison, paul, posey. Why weren't there more shooters? I would've liked to at least seen Peja out there.
#17
Kevin
12/15/09 01:53 PM
What couldn't Wright deliver when he was starting? He was playing great defense and rebounding then, too.
People seem to try and make him out to be more than he is. If you're expecting 20 points a game from him, you're going to be disappointed. He's an athlete; a defender... and THAT, he can provide nightly.
I feel like it would be of interest to put a defender on the floor when your team is bottom five in every defensive category, but that's just me...
#18
Ryan Schwan
12/15/09 02:12 PM
He contributed turnovers, bad shots, and wide open three point shots for the other team since he almost always helps too much off the ball.
He also contributed energetic rebounding, solid on-the-ball defense, and nice finishing on the break.
Julian is a mixed bag. Unfortunately, in half his games this season and last the mix has come out more negative than positive.
www.hornets247.com #19
LSUhornet
12/15/09 02:12 PM
@ Kevin
He's a good on the ball defender. When his man doesn't have the ball he tends to wander and give up a ton of open shots, often 3s. I love Juju too and hopes these couple of good minutes were a turning point, but he hasn't earned anything yet.
About the crunch time minutes, I totally have no problem with D-Song being out there at the end of the game, but I'd really like to see him out there with Okafor once in awhile. West was simply not having a good game, besides his good D on Dirk. I would have liked to see what Emeka could contribute with the game on the line (he had that winning tip-slam earlier in the year). I know DWest is a two-time all-star and has earned his spot out there with more than a few clutch shots, but so far this year he hasn't played that much better than Okafor offensively, and is certainly not the same defensive presence. Let's see what the new guy can do with the minutes.
#20
Diane
12/15/09 02:34 PM
Okay Ryan, What do you think of Barea now? As soon as I saw your comments yesterday I knew The Hornets were in trouble.
#21
Ryan Schwan
12/15/09 02:57 PM
Mea culpa, Diane. I cannot mock speedy guards in the NBA anymore - with the existing Hornets defense, I will always look foolish.
www.hornets247.com #22