Okafor gets a lot of flack from Hornets fans. Billed as a replacement for Tyson Chandler, I believe most were hoping that he would step in and give us the same highlight-reel alley-oops that Chandler did. When that didn't occur, and Okafor was frequently nowhere to be seen in the fourth quarter because of defensive issues, people really began to sour on him.
During the off-season Okafor's reputation has taken even more of a beating, as Bill Simmons listed him as one of the worst contracts in the league, all the rumors reported about Chris Paul being moved have involved Okafor with the implication that the only way to trade such a horrendous contract would be to send out some amazing talent with it.
All in all, it's not been a great six months for the Hornets' Center.
I do think, however, that there needs to be a sanity check about Okafor. Okafor is a solid player. He does a lot of things well, and the idea that he just needs to be dumped after only one very chaotic season is a bit inane.(Particularly when moving him now would be the epitome of selling low)
So, here are three popular Okafor myths and a stat-pack to knock em down.
1. Tyson Chandler was so much better than Okafor
First, let me state that yes, I know Chandler's a better defender. I recognize that. I still want to compare statistical apple to apples here: Tyson Chandler's first season as a Hornet to Emeka Okafor's first season as a Hornet. To make the comparison even stronger, I've included Okafor's stats in one row, and then give you his stats had he played as many minutes as Tyson Chandler did:
| Player |
M/G |
FG% |
FT% |
Stl/G |
Blk/G |
TO/G |
PF/G |
Reb/G |
Ast/G |
Pts/G |
| Chandler |
34.6 |
0.62 |
0.53 |
0.51 |
1.8 |
1.73 |
3.3 |
12.4 |
0.9 |
9.5 |
| Okafor |
28.9 |
0.53 |
0.56 |
0.66 |
1.5 |
1.35 |
2.7 |
9 |
0.7 |
10.4 |
| Okafor Normalized |
34.6 |
0.53 |
0.56 |
0.79 |
1.8 |
1.62 |
3.2 |
10.8 |
0.80 |
12.5 |
As you can see, they really aren't that far apart. Okafor scored a little more, albiet somewhat less efficiently, and Chandler rebounded a little more. So the idea that Okafor was terrible is a bit disingenuous.
2. Chris Paul didn't make Okafor better
Continue reading »
Recent Comments