It's pretty well known that the Hornets feature an other-worldly talent at point guard in Chris Paul. This journal is in no way an indictment on him or the way he plays. If he continues his career at the kind of level of production we've all become accustomed, who knows what will be said about CP after it's all over for him. What I am about to say will sound like blasphemy to most of you, but I've been thinking about this for quite a while (since last February to be exact). Can a team really build a championship contender around a point guard?
If you look back through the history of the NBA, the answer to that question is an overwhelming "yes, but VERY unlikely". The first NBA Champion was crowned in 1947. Looking back, I could only find three teams that won championships who's centerpiece was a point guard. One of those was Magic Johnson's Lakers. Magic was also 6'9 and could play all five positions on the floor, and usually played defense against the opposing SF. Not many point guards can do that from any era. Another PG-led team was the Detroit Pistons of the late '80s, who featured Isiah Thomas (to whom Chris Paul is mostly compared). The third is the '77-'78 Sonics, who were led by the late, great Dennis Johnson, who won Finals MVP that year. So there it is, 62+ years of NBA history, and three teams won championships with the PG being the centerpiece. Those teams won a total of 6 titles, so there is hope.
Let the Mikey-bashing....errr.... discussion begin.


7 glorious comments post your own
Caleb462
01/27/10 05:20 PM
I think its an interesting question and I'm glad you brought it up.
Its strange because so often people cateogrize the PG position as being extremely important to a team's success... yet when we look at NBA history, that view doesn't really hold water. And there are caveats to those examples you pointed out - Magic was, as you said, 6'9, and could play positions 1-5. And while he was, arguably, the team's centerpiece... it was a still a team that falls into the "championships are won by teams with great big men" theory - that big man being Kareem. Still, I like the Magic example because I think Magic (Isiah was great, but CP is already far greater in my opinion) is the former player most comparable to CP despite the huge difference in size.
As for Johnson and the Sonics, they won in one of the few eras in NBA history that didn't feature 2-3 teams dominating the landscape - with the Knicks, the Warriors, the Bullets, the Bucks, the Blazers, the Lakers and the Celts all winning titles in the 70's. Finally, while Isiah was the leading scorer and assist man for the Pistons - the Pistons won because they were a great defensive team. Still, its hard to argue with Isiah being the "centerpiece" there.
All that said, I do think CP is a point guard that a championship team can be built around. I think this because CP is a singular talent. The league has never really seen a point guard like Paul before, and I have no problem imagining CP writing a new kind of NBA history. With the right kind of talent around him, I have no doubt that CP could lead any team to a championship. Imagine the Hornets with Chris Bosh (one can dream...) for instance. Is there any one who doesn't think that team wins 60 games and at the very least challenges for a championship? CP would still be the centerpiece of that team.
neworleansbasketball.blogspot.com #1
nikkoewan
01/27/10 07:48 PM
i think we can build around a CP3, and i've been mulling about this for a long time, and what we need are this...
one big man should be a great defensive player(ben wallace or Chandler). This means he can rebound, block, and defend the post and face up game very well.
one big man who can spread the floor and still be a third option scorer. Wait, that's West.
an athletic 3 who can score the ball from anywhere. (Rudy Gay, i'm talking to you!). He need not be a defense mammoth, just average defender is fine. Just be athletic and a complete scorer.(can shoot, can slash and finish, can draw fouls)..
a 2 who can spread the floor and defend. Afflalo comes to mind, Bowen (even though i hate him) too.
a bench consisting of the following:
a competent backup( Collison fits this)
an energetic scorer of the bench( Thornton fits this)
a low post scorer and rebounder who is tall 6'10 maybe?
and a defensive specialist 3... :D
i think with that kind of a team, They(including Paul) can win a championship. :)
we have 1 megastar, 1 sure fire allstar, 1 tweener all star and a bunch of great role players who fit what cp3 needs - as weapons as possible.
#2
420ftJesus
01/27/10 11:10 PM
You smell of Elderberry.
I can't speak as technically on this as you (Marcus just scored), but I can easily ask questions.
This seems like a GM question. Can I fit the pieces in this salary cap? Or in the Lakers, Celtics, etc.'s case, what cap?
I will lean on what I know here: football.
The performance stat most correlated with victory is turnover differential (not ratio!), followed by plays of 20yds or more, so say the illuminati.
The Saints are built to feed those stats, yeah? And now that they are: Black and Gold Super Bowl.
Which leads me to...
Ryan, or other number-liker: what stats or attributes are most correlated with victory? What feeds the point machine? What pieces most likely contribute to wins?
Given the much smaller number of pieces and the same player performing multiple jobs, this question is much harder in basketball compared to football, I think.
#3
NOEngineer
01/28/10 01:02 AM
I think it will be difficult as long as there is the notion of "playoff basketball" where extreme contact is allowed during the playoffs, as in the San Antonio and Denver series that we lost. CP3 requires some space to create and some foul calls to be efficient. When those dry up in the post-season you need a big man and a slasher who can battle through contact. We have none....
#4
downnout
01/28/10 04:17 AM
all cp needs is a defensive center.. an athletic PF.. and scoring wingmen
what we have are : an undersized center, a jump shooting power forward and aging wingmen
trade DWest! before his value declines more
#5
Joe Gerrity
01/31/10 02:10 AM
For what it's worth, Okafor has been excellent this year. I can totally see him being the center for a contending team, hopefully next year.
#6
420ftJesus
01/31/10 09:52 AM
How many teams built around a true point guard, one probably not as good as Chris? if the answer is '"few," then maybe that is why the number is small I don't know enough history to answer.
Good question, though. I've been thinking about it to the extent I can.
#7