Not so much, says At The Hive. An excerpt:
The reason Chris Paul (and Dwyane Wade and LeBron James) are so good is because they can be incredibly efficient on offense while using a ton of possessions. This is why they are given a ton of possessions. Rondo has the process precisely backwards. And before we dispense with Rondo, one more thing:
Rondo, career usage: 18.3%
Paul, career usage: 24.8%
Rondo, points/100 possessions: 108
Paul, points/100 possessions: 124So not only would Rondo be worse than Paul if he were able to sustain his current efficiency and were given Paul’s usage (unlikely), he wouldn’t be close.
Tracking the T'Wolves
Young Pups