Tag Archives: Dunk That Sh!t

Dunk that Sh!t: Racking up Losses, Relocation, and Replacing Regulars

In a special Sunday Edition of Dunk that Sh!t, we discuss ping pong balls and expansion vs. relocation Continue reading

Permalink Back to top Leave a comment

Dunk That Sh!t: Looking for the Bright Spots

You asked us if there are things to look forward to. Did we find them?

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 4 Comments

Dunk That Sh!t: It’s all about Value

Michael, Jason, and Mason answer three questions directly from you, for you.

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 6 Comments

Dunk That Sh!t: Divining Dell’s Deals, Landry’s Location, and Saints Silence?

Michael, Joe, and Jason answer three questions directly from the Hornets247 community.

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 10 Comments

Dunk That Sh!t: Answering Chris Kaman, A Trade, Fourth Quarters, and Fan Support

Our writers answer your burning questions about The Hornets on TV, Al Horford, fourth quarters, and the support of those in attendance at New Orleans Arena.

Aminu Dunking that Sh!t

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 12 Comments

Dunk That Sh!t: Crescent City Champion

Evil Dead Dollar Bill

Good . . . Bad . . . I'm the Guy with the Gun!

Make It Rain (Hornets Report): 42, do you have any ideas who another potential sponsor could be?

42: This is a very timely question, given the recent success the Hornets have had with sponsors. The success is even more substantial given the state of the economy, the current climate in the NBA, and the focus on New Orleans, Louisiana, and the Gulf Coast in terms of support of this kind.

Since the Hornets arrived in New Orleans . . . twice . . . and even with the Jazz before them, the business community’s supports has been below what it should. There are many causes and effects of this, but getting the sponsors on board and providing them with value makes all of them things of the past.

Sponsors provide massive sums of money directly to teams in exchange for the opportunity to get the fans to throw their money at them instead of their competitors. When it works to a satisfactory degree, the relationship is stable or grows. So, despite the fact that the sponsors get more press lately than the 2,500+ full season tickets that have been added, we are truly the wind beneath the Hornets’ wings.

This money, all ultimately coming from the fans, is then used to improve the team, improve the business, and keep the ownership happy. Less frequently, it is use to attract an owner . . .

There are lots of ways to answer the question posed, and I’ll be addressing some of them. I expect the community to have answers, as well.

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 12 Comments

Dunk That Sh!t: What’s in a Name?

Let's Go, Appropriate Team!

Let's Go, Appropriate Team!

Chris Savoie (via email): If and when this CBA gets settled and if and when we get a local owner who agrees to keep the team here, what do you think about a rebrand? What would the name of the team be? Colors? Logo?

42: Fun question. I like it. We sometimes don’t have enough fun.

This question has been bandied about since before the arrival of the team, but I’m not sure there will ever be a better time to discuss this than AK50 . . . er . . . right now. This is a question best addressed in an egalitarian manner, like on a blog where every member can comment and write a journal.

When the team relocated here, blogs didn’t have nearly the penetration and quality that they have today, and when the team returned from their Katrina-induced re-relocation in their re-re-relocation to New Orleans, they were in the long shadow cast by the reborn Saints, both figuratively and literally, due to the Dome’s magnificent presence beside the Arena. An oft-overlooked fact is that the Dome gives the Arena shelter from the storm, as it was built with the Dome in mind when it comes to storm protection, a necessity.

Before we belly-flop into this pool of creole blue Jell-O, if you like the graphic, send some thanks to the nice folks who sell the shirt.

The Short: I prefer and anticipate no change.

The Long: This is actually a deep question. There are lots of reasons one could trot out for a rebrand, each with points for and against depending on the eye of the beholder. Off the top of my head:

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 28 Comments

Dunk That Sh!t: Rooting for the Mavericks?!?!

Maverick Basketball

Maverick Basketball

In the “Dear Abby” vein . . .

Ryan Arkin (via Twitter): I find myself rooting for the Mavs this postseason, mostly due to Peja and Tyson, but part of me just doesn’t feel right cheering for a division foe. What should I do? I fear that the confidence that comes with winning a title will make the Mavericks tougher to beat when we play them in the immediate future. Help me @Hornets247!

42: Ryan, let me preface this by saying that I hate Dallas. As a result, you may want to petition your Hornets247 comrades for answers.

The Short: Screw the Mavericks, but do what you want.

The Long: You bring up a few points in this: part vs. whole, identity, sources of power, and choice / free will. I will have fun and address each.

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 43 Comments

Dunk That Sh!t: New Star

42's Dunktastic Superstardom

42

Every team has a bench, and on that bench there may just be the next superstar . . . but it’s likely that the backup just hasn’t been exposed as not being worth the role of backup . . .

As I sit here at Highland Coffees in Baton Rouge with my ladyfriend and the guy that chose me as his best man . . . I enter the fray as your backup for Mike today . . . hit my music . . .

Apologies in advance . . .

With only one further ellipsis . . .

Ben Matthews (from the U.K.): Do you really see Demps making a move to aquire a star-type player to pair with Paul keeping in mind that the proposed CBA deal doesn’t really help the Hornets out that much?

42: First of all, thanks for reading, writing, and participating. Also, this is a question that is on the mind of many, so good call there, as well. Jolly good!

Also, if you like what you read here, or don’t, head on over to the survey and express yourself. Comment away as well!

The short: I don’t think Dell Demps is going to pick up a star.  Rather, I expect him to retool the roster in a manner similar to last year, just to a lesser degree but with greater effect.

The long: Restricting our timeframe from today until the trade deadline for the upcoming season, if there is one . . . I don’t think Dell Demps is going to pick up a star.  In my mind, there are 4 ways to get a star, onto your team, which are, in no particular order: Drafting a star, signing a star in free agency, trading for a star, and developing a star. The same goes for non-stars, too, and I’ll be discussing that even though that wasn’t what was asked.

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 26 Comments

Dunk that Sh!t: CP3 Edition

Well, at least the made up trade scenarios for Chris Paul are getting better. Remember when he was going to Orlando for Jameer Nelson and a pile of junk last summer? No longer. Now, he is destined to be a Thunder (it is so odd when the team name is not plural) and the Hornets will be granted a budding All-Star in return. Gee thanks false internet rumors, we really appreciate it. How very kind of you.

Today we had two questions that come regarding CP3 that kind of go hand in hand, so we will take a look at what the facts say on this edition of Dunk that Sh!t:

James Grayson (Swarm and Sting): What is the likelihood that Chris Paul accepts the extension offered by Dell Demps? Seeing as the contract can only be offered AFTER the CBA expires can Dell even offer it to him? And if so is it a 20 million-a-year contract or one far less?

Michael McNamara: I will actually answer the second question first, and although I can not know this for certain, everything points to a scenario in which Chris Paul’s contract extension will be significantly less than the 20 million dollar per year one that you proposed. All we have to do is look at the aims of the owners in prior CBA’s as evidence for how they are going to negotiate in this session. In 1998-99, the owners were worried that spending was getting out of control and that they needed to put a cap on max salaries in order to curb that spending. Michael Jordan had just received a contract a couple of seasons prior that paid him $30 million annually and Kevin Garnett had recently inked a 6 year 126 million dollar contract after just three years in the league. Seeing the potential for this to become disastorious, the owners capped max contracts at between 9 million and 14 million (depending on how long you had been in the league).

Think about that for a second. That means that Michael Jordan’s earning potential would have theoretically dropped by over 50%. Garnett’s dropped by nearly that same amount when you factor in that he was just a fourth year player after the lockout ended and would have likely only gotten 10-11 million per year. This is the reason why Carmelo Anthony’s agent was so aggressive in getting him dealt to a team where he could sign the 3 year/65 million dollar extension. In all likelihood, Melo would have lost 20-35 million dollars had he waited until after the new CBA, just like KG would have lost boatloads of money if he had not signed his extension prior to the lockout.

There is no telling just how much the owners will push to put a significantly lower cap on max contracts, but they might not even have to directly write this into the CBA. Let’s say they get this 45 million dollar hard cap that they are looking for. How then could they commit 20+ million dollars to one player and still be able to put together a competitive team? The only hope for superstars is that the owners do what they should have done all along- pay the mega stars what they deserve and give the change to the guys who don’t put the butts in the seats. But even then, committing half of your cap to one player will, best case, just lead to a Lebron in Cleveland type of outcome for a team.

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 43 Comments

Dunk that Sh!t: Friday Edition

John D’Oriocourt  (@Kibner on Twitter) : Can the D League be used to develop raw players or is there a lack of teaching NBA fundamentals down there?

Michael McNamara: When you talk about guys who have used the D League as a spring board for their NBA careers, the list is not overly impressive, but it is a nice collection of solid role players. The list includes (but is not limited to): Chris “Birdman” Anderson, Mikki Moore, Matt Barnes, Chuck Hayes, Kelenna Azukuke, Bobby Simmons, Aaron Brooks, Ramon Sessions, CJ Watson, Will Bynum, Shannon Brown, JJ Barea, and Reggie Williams.

In fact, at the start of last season, 63 players on NBA opening day rosters had D-League experience. Now, some of those guys were guys who were virtually guaranteed a spot from the get-go and merely went down to the D-League to work on their game or get some minutes (think Jonny Flynn). But many of the guys on the list I mentioned in the first paragraph might have never seen an NBA court if not for their time in the developmental league.

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 8 Comments

Dunk that Sh!t: First Edition

Over the summer, we will solicit questions from those of you in the community to be answered in our new daily piece, Dunk that Sh!t. No power layups here, just straight, hard core answers and facts to all of your questions. To submit your questions, either hit us up via Twitter (@hornets247) or on Facebook. Or you can email Michael McNamara at mcnamarahornets247@yahoo.com. Now, on to the questions. Since this was 42′s brain child, I will honor him with the first question.

42 (from NASA): Mike, I was dreaming of muffulettas last night and woke up wondering: Is Belinelli worth his $3.4m qualifying offer to someone? How about Smith’s $3.1m? Andersen’s $2.7m team option? If so, should we sign them, then trade them away for a player or a pick? Or is that too risky before the new CBA?

Michael McNamara: You’ve got me thinking about the Hornets as a muffuletta now. Who is the olive salad of this team? The provolone? We all know CP3 would be the capicola because “Its ‘da best”, but does that make West the ham or the salami? I digress. Back to your question. Let’s start with the easiest one first, David Anderson. Anderson is obviously not worth 2.7 million dollars in this market, or any other conceivable one that we might see in the new CBA. The only reason the Hornets would pick up his option would be if they had a trade worked out with another team before June 30th and they needed his salary to make the trade work.

As for Smith and Belinelli, their situations are slightly different because the Hornets only have the ability to extend them qualifying offers. Those qualifying offers, in essence, make the player a restricted free agent, but would not allow the Hornets to trade those players until those offers are signed. So, if the Hornets do extend those offers, they must do so with knowledge that it is a very real possibility that neither of those players will get better offers on the market, and as a result, those players will be back on the team next year at those exact salaries.

To judge whether or not those players are worth those salaries, I would first rank those players in the upcoming free agent market and then look to free agent acquisitions in the past to determine what teams might be willing to offer. Belinelli will likely be the 7th or 8th best shooting guard available on the market, depending on whether guys like Shannon Brown and Mickael Pietrus opt-out of their current contracts. Last season, there were a couple of guys who were of similar age to Belinelli and were in that same range with regard to their free agent class: Anthony Morrow and Randy Foye. Randy Foye got a 2 year/8 million dollar deal with the Clippers, while Morrow got a 3 year/12 million dollar deal with the Nets.

Continue reading

Permalink Back to top 26 Comments